Diarrhea is diarrhea- everyone gets it and it means nothing about HIV.
yeah i know im beginning to feel better, but i guess im just nervous because ive had pretty bad diarrhea all week.
"Low risk" accounts for the chance of breakage and slippage. If a condom doesn't break or slip off, then it's no risk. Your condom didn't break or slip off, so you had no risk. An intact condom is 100% effective, no exceptions.
well they say low risk which is still a risk. most people would read that as no risk whereas i see it the other way....small but still a risk.
utter rubbish. No website will say protected sex is a risk of hiv, its complete and utter rubbish,!!!!
i know but it's still "possible" to get hiv through protected sex, every site i read hedges their bets and says condoms are not 100%.
i guess i need to stop worrying though, the event was in september of 2012 and she tested negative i know in march of 2012 so the odds are in my favor no matter what here.
Test for what, you never had a risk of HIV, do you understand that buds?
yeah i realize that i guess i just get irrational about the whole thing and feel guilty over it. it's just that whole 3% thing that produce antibodies after 3 months that is getting to me.
i also keep telling myself that if the nurse really thought i should have been tested at 6 months she would have made me come back ya know.
Well im a little lost, why are worring about a test when protected sex is not a risk of HIV, dont you think you should entertain that fact first.
Also, modern tests are 99.9% accurate after 3 months and lets not forget, less than 1% of the population have HIV. Put all this together, its just impossible you have HIV and more so the fact you were never even at risk of HIV.