The theory behind these 4th generation dual Ab/Ag tests is that the Ag picks up a large chunk of the HIV+ people that aren't picked up by the Ab test. I'm not familiar with the data at 3 weeks, but at 4 weeks, the Ab tests would pick up 80% of HIV+ves, while the Ag tests pick up 75%, so combined they pick up 95% of HIV+ people.
At 3 weeks, the ratios would be different - the Ab test would pick up less, probably in the region of 50%, but the Ag test may pick up more. Maybe other posters will have greater knowledge on this.
I can't put a number on it, but I would say that the negative is very encouraging, but not conclusive.
Yes. This test is based on the theory that antigen and antibody have reverse correlation, i.e. when antigen is high antibody is low, vise versa.
So antigen show poz when antibody is below detectable level, and antibody show poz when antigen is suppressed. So theoretically it will shorten the window period to the first minute antigen increased to detectable level after exposure, which is a few days to 2 weeks after exposure. But there is also risk that antigen decreases to below detectable level before antibody increases to detectable level, i.e. the second gray/indeterminate period after the initial window period, which may occur between 2-4 weeks, though not very probable.
It is said that this test should be accurate after 4 weeks (I believe it is the test used in NY) for most people. And three week is very encouraging.
My exposure was low risk anyway, vagina to anal contact via fingering,.. doc HHH said:
'You do not need testing, except for peace of mind-that is if you would sleep better knowing the result of a lab test, go ahead and have it done, you can count on a negative result'
I also see on wikepedia (dont know how reliable the info is) that the window period for Ab test is stated as ave 22 days, and for Ab/Ag it says 16days
I know these are averages but it is encouraging that I have a neg Ab/Ag at 22 days.
Considering the low risk maybe I should put this behind me now rather than going through the ordeal of testing again in a week or two?
The doc also said it was safe to have unprotected sex with my wife now!
This site complies with the HONcode standard for trustworthy health information.
The Content on this Site is presented in a summary fashion, and is intended to be used for educational and entertainment purposes only. It is not intended to be and should not be interpreted as medical advice or a diagnosis of any health or fitness problem, condition or disease; or a recommendation for a specific test, doctor, care provider, procedure, treatment plan, product, or course of action. Med Help International, Inc. is not a medical or healthcare provider and your use of this Site does not create a doctor / patient relationship. We disclaim all responsibility for the professional qualifications and licensing of, and services provided by, any physician or other health providers posting on or otherwise referred to on this Site and/or any Third Party Site. Never disregard the medical advice of your physician or health professional, or delay in seeking such advice, because of something you read on this Site. We offer this Site AS IS and without any warranties. By using this Site you agree to the following Terms and Conditions. If you think you may have a medical emergency, call your physician or 911 immediately.