Member Comments are provided by individuals and reflect their personal opinions only. Under NO circumstances should you act on any advice or opinion posted in this forum.  ALWAYS check with your personal physician before taking any action regarding your health! MedHelp International and our partners, sponsors and affiliates have no obligation to monitor any comments posted on this site, or the content and/or accuracy of such exchanges. MedHelp International does not endorse the views of any user.
 | 

8 weeks is 98%?

by magictaylor, Nov 15, 2008 09:54AM
I read plenty of times that most people serocovert by 8 weeks.  Like 98%.  This percentage is an estimate?  Does everybody typically agree with that?  Can we compare those 98% statitistics with something other than HIV as the item for comparison idea.  Also what does that 98% reflect - 1000's of people diagnosed with hiv, 100s of people diagnosed with hiv?  

I read six weeks negative is a very good sign but some people have a lot of faith and trust in the government and cdc and a lot of professionals are scared of the gov. and cdc. I know theyre not the most reliable doctors as history has shown the cdc's mistakes and lies so I will test every other week now beyond my 6 week mark.  Also being that theyre in GA, says a lot about them.  Maybe if they were in DC, NY, CA, or MA I would feel more confident in them.

I just really dont know these answers as much as I try to make sense of it or think I understand it.
Member Comments (8)

by LIZZIE LOU, Nov 15, 2008 03:40PM
what does the fact that they are in GA have to do with anything?  geeeeeeeeeez!!!!!

what is it that you want to know?  

fact:  most ppl will test positive by 4 weeks
fact:  a negative test at 6-8 weeks is a good indicator and highly unlikely to change
fact:  the cdc, fda, and the manufacturers of the tests, set the 3 month guideline.
fact:  until these agencies change those guidelines...NO ONE else can.

by magictaylor, Nov 15, 2008 10:19PM
To: Lizzie Lou
Your answers are appreciated and I dont know why I have to read this again and again to remember or understand it.  Must be stress.  I read this everyday over and over again.  I usually dont post much but read the forums.

6-8 weeks is highly unlikely to change.  Like how unlikely aside from a 98% chance - being spontaneously diagnosed with cancer at 24, winning lottery,  it raining on a day the weather didnt forecast it?

  Im not joking despite my dumb examples.  PErhaps another would be better suited.

by andagainintothefire, Nov 15, 2008 10:24PM
Winning the lottery of the world

by magictaylor, Nov 15, 2008 10:53PM
To: andagainintothefire
...........

by andagainintothefire, Nov 15, 2008 11:20PM
Meaning, winning the lottery, the rain falling, whatever. The rule on this site is 12 weeks for a conclusive negative (re: 99%+ conclusive) result. Your 6-8 week test is mainly to put your mind at ease as it hardly ever goes from negative to positve after a 6-8 week negative. 98%, 97% 96%, all those are really good odds, so take it easy

by Iammaxii, Nov 16, 2008 03:02AM
8 week test is 99% accurate. most likely to change. I'm going to test tomorrow again after 14 week. Pray for me it should not change

by NeverAgain624, Nov 17, 2008 01:13PM
To: lannaxii
I am praying for you!  Please update this form on the good news you will be receiving shortly!!

by TheIrish63, Nov 18, 2008 08:39PM
I had a test at 8 weeks and came back negative. I asked my doctor if I needed to test again at 12 weeks and he said no. He seemed like a competent doctor but I'll get tested again at 12 weeks just in case. Sounds like 8 weeks is fairly definitive.
Related discussions
Post Comment
To
Comment
Post Comment
Recent Activity
swampcritter commented on Cost and Availablity ...
1 hr ago
justjazzy is still feeling this way
Teak just shakes his head.
JayWebb Freaked out, and will be for the next 6 months, help pleas...
MrsMacDugle commented on 18 dec
9 hrs ago
scaredouttamymind42 added the Mood Tracker
9 hrs ago
dinesh133 commented on HIV: THE FACTS
9 hrs ago
18 dec
11 hrs ago by drifter0213
RSS Expert Activity
Sad cases of Animal Cruelty
11 hrs ago by Thomas Dock, Vet. Technician
Cost and Availablity of Medical Car...
19 hrs ago by John C Hagan III, MD, FACS
Behavior Medications for our Pets -... 
Dec 17 by Jim Humphries, B.S., D.V.M.
Community Members