scared_aussie already responded accurately (below). You have no cause to be "worried sick". You read wrong; oral sex is not an appreciable risk for HIV. Briefly: 1) You had safe sex and have no HIV/STD worries. 2) No, that's too long. 3) No. Symptoms virtually never are a useful indicator of whether or not someone has acquired a new HIV infection, no matter how tyical they are. (And yours aren't typical anyway.) 4) No.
You don't say why you "regret" the sexual events you describe. Perhaps infidelity to another partner, or maybe you are morally conflicted about commercial sex. From a health standpoint there is no cause for regret.
HHH, MD
Here is a link to Dr. H's answer to my question:
http://www.medhelp.org/perl6/HIV/messages/372.html
I can only forecast what the doctor will tell you. Please remember to wait for Dr. H's answer - I am just a normal user, who happened to have a very similar question and a very similar problem.
1) Your exposure of unprotected oral sex carries a negligible infection risk.
2) Symptoms don't mean anything. ARS typically starts 2-4 weeks after exposure. Symtoms normally come at the same time - and leave at the same time
3) Symptoms don't mean anything at all, as they can be caused by 100000 different things.
4) Test for your peace of mind. Since it was more than six weeks ago, your test will be conclusive and you will be able to put all this behind you.
I hope this helps. Again, wait for Dr.H's answer, which will be more informed. I only did an intensive corse on being worried sick about oral sex, rather than a full degree in medicine.
I know that symptoms are not conclusive when it comes to HIV, however I was just curious why my symptoms were not like ARS? Is it because of the length of time of the symptom, (5 days) or was it because it was not accompanied by anything else??
And my last question, I promise not to fill this forum with what ifs. I just had a question about condom use. When they say condoms are 95% percent effective in the prevention of HIV, does that mean that the 5% that are not effective are due to Condom Breakage or slippage?
Thanks so much, and I promise not to ask more questions on this topic.
A properly used condom that doesn't break is 100% effective in preventing HIV transmission. The 95% figure is on a broad, population basis--that is, it takes improper use into account.
HHH, MD
There is just so much information on the internet which gives a different perspective.
I was just curious what everyone's opinion (Including Dr HHH) on thi matter is.
Thanks everyone!