If so, please comment if there were specific conditions to consider (like co-infection with another virus at the same time possibly delaying antibody responses, auto-immune disorders
That question has been asked and explained thousands of times and usually several times a week if not days, who may take longer than 3 months to obtain a conclusive test result and you've been here long enough to have read it.
You are right about that, but honestly, I have never seen someone from the 'worried well' posting after they have found they were positive. Maybe this is so because most people here were never truly at risk. Of course, they would never seroconvert after 3 months. So, given the lack of reports from truly positive people, how reliable is that '3 months is final' anyway.
Like you say, I have read a lot about the exceptions here (the post 3 month seroconvertors), but how do I know if they are true or not? So Teak, please confirm these cased as to be taken into consideration or not:
1. Immunocompromised persons
2. Organ transplant persons
3. Cancer treatment persons
4. PEP users
These 4 cases, i understand an find back in medical guidelines, but what about these:
1. Co-infection with Hepatitis C
2. Co-infection with Mononucleosis
Apparently, in those cases, both virus infections will have delayed conversions, hence no anitbodies in the blood, for any of those viruses.
So how could a person know if he is co-infected, don't we have to consider risk of co-infection (especially with Hep C) for at least a specific group of people (gay males).
But what about the case of the 3 nurses more than 10 years ago who only sero-converted after 1 year, 2 of the 3 were apparently co-infected with hep C.
This case is often referred to as a reason to test beyond 3 months.
It is even mentioned on wikipedia under the 'HIV testing'. Wikipedia still refers to the 6 months for 'exceptional cases'.
Thank you Jose for responding.
I wish the medical experts would dismiss this specific case of the 90's nurses once and for all as not relevant anymore in these times. It remains a bizarre case.
What you say about the 'suicide case' proofs that there is no real sense in saying that co-infection with HCV would delay seroconversion. It could be the opposite as well.
Thanks for telling me about this, it relieves some of my remaining 'anxiety of delayed seroconversion'.
Wikipedia should be updated, I thought there was some control over the reliability of the information given there. Many people use wikipedia as first line information source. The 6 months period and the nurse cases are put there in a confusing way.
* This HIV Community is a place to discuss HIV Prevention based upon the criteria established by MedHelp’s doctors.
* Anyone who continues to post excessively, questioning a conclusively negative result or no-risk situation, will be subject to action by MedHelp. Conclusively negative results or a no-risk situation will be based upon the criteria established by MedHelp’s doctors. Action will be taken as follows:
* After excessive posting, a warning will be issued by MedHelp
* Continuing to post regarding the negative result / no risk situation will result in a 3 day suspension
* Continuing to post upon your return will result in a permanent ban.