I'm an unaware of any "controversy surrounding" p24
antigenCea
Histocompatibility antigen test
Hla-b27 antigen
Psa tests. However, a PCR test would be even better than p24
antigenCea
Histocompatibility antigen test
Hla-b27 antigen
Psa. The PCR has a higher risk of false positvies, but also might be more
effectiveEffective strength cough syrup in detecting early infection. However, this is outside my immediate expertise; I'm not sure either test is wise or necessary at this point, since the risk of catching HIV in this situation is low, although not zero. But neither you nor I should be deciding exactly what tests to have. See a health care provider who is familiar with HIV/AIDS, explain the situation, then follow his or her advice about what tests to have and when.
Now comes the lecture: It was a mistake to have
sexBuccal smear
Causes of sexual dysfunction
Child abuse - sexual
Delayed ejaculation
Erection problems
Female sexual dysfunction
Inhibited sexual desire
Orgasmic dysfunction
Puberty and adolescence
Rape
Safe sex of any kind with such a high risk partner without
firstFirst progesterone mc10
First progesterone mc5
First-progesterone vgs 100
First-progesterone vgs 200
First-progesterone vgs 25
First-progesterone vgs 400
First-progesterone vgs 50
First-testosterone
First-testosterone mc discussing HIV, i.e. telling him your HIV status and asking about his; and avoiding sex with those who are positive, don't know, or are evasive about it. In the long run, "Do ask, do tell" is just as important in HIV prevention for men who have sex with men as are condoms for anal sex. And think how much less worried you would be if he had said he is HIV negative and seemed to be honest about it.
Good luck-- HHH, MD
If I might get a little clarification, I know some people (non-experts in the community forum) dislike the PCR and p24 test because of false positives, but are there also false negatives? In a funny way, I'm more willing to accept a false positive and do follow up testing, since my paranoia already has me expecting the worst. It;'s the false negative that seems more damaging to me.
Thanks for your time and the good work you do!
Before those intervals, all these tests can be falsely negative. But after ~2 weeks for p24 and PCR and 4-6 weeks for antibody, false negative results are rare.
Persons at risk for HIV are generally wiser to plan on routine HIV testing at intervals, rather than getting tested after every potentially risky event. The average gay/bi man in the US probably should just test once a year -- or if at particularly high risk (e.g., men who often have unprotected anal sex), as often as every 3 months. Of course there are exceptions for especially high risk exposures, e.g. if someone has had anal sex with a known-infected partner.
Isn't Rapid Testing More Accurate ?
Have you ever seen someone go from Negative at 6 weeks to positive at 13 weeks ?
hope you answer, if not, I understand.
Thank you
Wee
"Isn't Rapid Testing More Accurate?" No. Rapid testing has a higher chance of false positive results than laboratory-based antibody testing.
"Have you ever seen someone go from Negative at 6 weeks to positive at 13 weeks?" No, and with the modern HIV tests in use for the past decade, I have never heard of such a case from my colleagues.
That will have to end this thread.