Are There Rare Hiv Infected Who Don't Develop Antibodies? - The ...
www.thebody.com/.../are-there-rare-hiv-infected-who-dont-develop-anti...
hi
but we have 25 rare case, in first recognise hiv 1 the patient not have produce antibodies in viral load,from 30 year in history hiv.
thats what i needed to know:))) thank you sir
god bless you
thank you sir.
i just try to understand ..
so all hiv infected(at the past and present ) peoples had antibodys?
there was no case hiv infected person didnt produce antiboys
im so sorry please dont get me wrong//or angry with me,,
An infected person will always produce antibodies,usually by 6 weeks in 99% of cases and once infected they will always have detectable antibodies for HIV,even once diagnosed with AIDS the antibodies will still be present.
cozs with new effected person dont have antibods i just thinks if the person never produce
Please seek help for your irrational thoughts,I don't know what websites you have been reading but they are dead wrong.
so there was no one has hiv but without antibods
I mean after 6 months still not antibidys but have hiv?? Is it possible
If you test to early there may not be enough antibodies for the tests to detect.
Has any1 ever infected hiv without producing antibody??
The window period is 4 weeks to 3 months.
Experts what is the latest you seen hiv turns pozs??
With current tests the window period for almost everyone is 6 weeks, that's why most agencies say "3 months", just to be EXTRA sure. You tested 6 months after.
For instance, this is the BASHH (UK) Statement on HIV window.
http://www.bashh.org/documents/2613
You're HIV negative. Be happy and move on.
If you have tested negative at 24 weeks then there is nothing further to discuss,you don't have HIV and if you can't accept this fact then seek some therapy.
No there is not huge difference.
Has any helathy man ever tested after 3 months?
Plus how good is pcr at 7 months ?
As already have 24 weeks negative
If pcr comes negative then i will believe
An HIV test taken after 3 months means you are HIV negative. Period.
I am not here to argue either,if you want to believe those figures it's up to you but I am stating facts.An HIV test is 100% conclusive at 3 months and means the person does NOT have HIV.Anyway,is there really a big difference between 99.99 and 100,no there isn't.
I do not want argue
All i want clear explanation
Thanks
If an HIV DUO test is 99.89% at 4 weeks then how can what you suggest be correct.3 months is 100% conclusive in 2012 under any circumstance.