Aa
Aa
A
A
A
Close
Avatar universal

Is 3 month Testing Conclusive Regardless of Risk?

Please provide clarification to all.  Is 3 month testing conclusive regardless of risk?  If it was an occupational hazzard would that change testing periods? Thank you.
8 Responses
Sort by: Helpful Oldest Newest
Avatar universal
Do what you want but no one on this site ever says 6 months. Anyone who says 6 months is behind the times. Either believe us or don't but we are not going to go around in circles.
Helpful - 0
Avatar universal
Vance and Teak,
I am confident in your response and assurances and am relieved when I read them. But I have had some medical concerns (i'm 21 weeks post possible exposure), I won't call them symptoms becasue I don't know if they are but they concern me and when I chat with folks or read more I become nervous.  

I have a white tongue in the morning and the tip of my tongue is red.  I brush it and it becomes mostly pink but then in the morning it's white again.  I have had small little bumps under my arm pits and ears, they come and go, I have occassional pain under my chin and I believe I have more moles than before.  Agian, I am concerned with differing information and comments from others saying I should test at 6 months. I just want to be able to inform them that I'm ok that 3 month is conclusive.
Helpful - 0
Avatar universal
· Anyone who continues to post excessively, questioning a conclusive negative result or no-risk situation, will be subject to action by MedHelp. Conclusive negative results or a no-risk situation will be based up the criteria MedHelp’s doctors. Action will be taken as follows:
* After excessive posting, a warning will be issued by MedHelp
* Continuing to post regarding the negative result / no risk situation will result in a 3 day suspension
* Continuing to post upon your return will result in a permanent ban.
Helpful - 0
Avatar universal
Are you undergoing chemyo or just had an organ replaced? No then move on. Just read your interaction with Dr.Hook.
Helpful - 0
Avatar universal
If testing was required at 6 months is that 24 weeks or the actual 6 months? If someone tested at 22 weeks would that make a difference?
Helpful - 0
Avatar universal
3 month would probably pick up all infections no matter what but those specific people are asked to test out to 6 months.
Helpful - 0
Avatar universal
So a 3 month negative test is conclusive and no further testing would be required regardless of the risk.  Would 3 month pick up those even with chemo, organ transplants etc.,
Helpful - 0
Avatar universal
If someone has an actual risk then 3 months is conclusive. Because 3 months is the time frame set up by the manufacture of the tests and approved by the FDA and CDC. This time frame will pick up ALL infections no matter of risk.
Helpful - 0
Have an Answer?

You are reading content posted in the HIV Prevention Community

Top HIV Answerers
366749 tn?1544695265
Karachi, Pakistan
370181 tn?1595629445
Arlington, WA
Learn About Top Answerers
Didn't find the answer you were looking for?
Ask a question
Popular Resources
Condoms are the most effective way to prevent HIV and STDs.
PrEP is used by people with high risk to prevent HIV infection.
Can I get HIV from surfaces, like toilet seats?
Can you get HIV from casual contact, like hugging?
Frequency of HIV testing depends on your risk.
Post-exposure prophylaxis (PEP) may help prevent HIV infection.