now raj is giving advice. that is funny! if you add 10 factors together against a man who is uncircumsized and multiply it times thre risk 0, you get 0. if you multiply all the factors of the circumsixed male times zero you get 0. so no!
Well, the point being made when someone says that the risk of transmission is cut by a certain percentage is a valid one. Basically, all that is being said is that circumcision helps to reduce the risks of unprotected sex by some degree. I think that's useful information.
On the other hand, it is a moot point when talking about protected sex. It does not matter if one is circumcised or not, as the condom acts as an effective barrier to the HIV virus. In other words, cut or uncut, it doesn't really matter when wearing a condom. So, to answer your question, yes, the circumcised and uncircumcised male are equally safe when wearing a condom (very, very, very safe), and they both enjoy the effective protection that a condom affords.
And moreover there is no 60%-40%--If ur at risk by .0000001% ur at risk---Thats my opinion.
u never get HIV from a condom protected Sex. Forget abt the circumcised. Circumcised only come into topic when ur having unprotecetd Sex. Protected Sex-NO HIV...