Nutrition Health Chat: Tuesday, Dec. 8th, 5-6 PM Eastern. Learn how vitamins, minerals, and phytonutrients affect your health. Free live Q&A. Join us!
Member Comments are provided by individuals and reflect their personal opinions only. Under NO circumstances should you act on any advice or opinion posted in this forum.  ALWAYS check with your personal physician before taking any action regarding your health! MedHelp International and our partners, sponsors and affiliates have no obligation to monitor any comments posted on this site, or the content and/or accuracy of such exchanges. MedHelp International does not endorse the views of any user.
 | 

Positive test result, then negative

by ParanoidaboutHiv, Nov 09, 2009 04:25PM
Hi, I went to the sexual health clinic today and got tested for HIV (routine). the counselor told me there was a delay in the lab and that he was going to test me right in his office. he tested me with the oraquick test while i was waiting on the unigold rapid test results. the oraquick came back negative. the unigold came back reactive (turns out they were re-testing my blood). I went to another clinic for another test, this one they pricked my finger. The guy at the second clinic tested me twice. both tests came back negative. I am really anxious now as i'm waiting on Western Blot results from that reactive test. My counselor at the first clinic told me that he thinks this is a false positive and that i shouldnt worry. I cant stop worrying. Is anyone familiar with false positives ? anyone had one before? any advice? should i go to a different clinic and get tested again?
Member Comments (8)

by JeanClaude, Nov 09, 2009 06:52PM
To: ParanoidaboutHiv
It's my opinion that you had a False Positive. You would NOT have had repeated NEGATIVES subsequently if you were actually POSITIVE. This does happen occasionally for various reasons. You do NOT need to test again as your WESTERN BLOT is pending. The result from this test will trump any other results.

-JC-

by ParanoidaboutHiv, Nov 09, 2009 07:03PM
To: JeanClaude
thank you for your encouraging words JeanClaude. they do help. even if i were recently infected, and the unigold was picking up antibodies, do you think that the oraquick and the other two at the second clinic would pick those antibodies up too? I got clear negatives on all subsequent tests. the original was a faint 'reactive'. i guess i'll only feel comfortable after a month or so, after no sexual activity, with a negative result.

by JeanClaude, Nov 09, 2009 08:38PM
To: ParanoidaboutHiv
Both of the tests subsequent to the "Faint Positive" were Serum-Based (blood) rapid tests. Yes, they would have ben POSITVE as well if indeed you were infected.

-JC-

by ParanoidaboutHiv, Nov 09, 2009 10:50PM
To: JC
thanks again JC. i guess my only worry now is that that 'faint positive' was true and the other ones just werent picking up the antibodies yet. but, you say that they'd also show positive if i indeed were, huh? i think i need to talk to some people online and give and get some moral support. this will be a long week waiting on my western blot results. and if that test in indeterminate, it'll be more anxiety.

by JeanClaude, Nov 10, 2009 04:59AM
To: ParanoidaboutHiv
There is infinitely more chance that you's have a single False Positive  than repeated False Negatives. Have you had a risk in the last 3 months? if not a False Negative is of NO concern.

-JC-

by ParanoidaboutHiv, Nov 10, 2009 12:41PM
To: JC
I am a homosexual male, and i am in a high risk group, though i do not practice high risk 'activities' as 'high risk' is understood to be. i think i may choose not to call back for that western blot result. that clinic gave me two conflicting results. why should i trust them again? there's a chance they may have made some error. i think i'll wait a few weeks and get tested somewhere else. i'm abstaining from sexual activity, and i think that the result from a test in a few more weeks will be much more reliable than the crap i got at that place.

by JeanClaude, Nov 10, 2009 01:23PM
To: ParanoidaboutHiv
I don't believe anyone gave you conflicting results. Occasionally a test may appear "Reactive" when it is NOT. This is why a seemingly "reactive" test needs to be CONFIRMED, a NON-REACTIVE test does NOT ( outside of the window period). Occasionally, a rapid test is misread as "faint" positive when in fact it is NOT. I strongly advise you to return for your Western Blot Results as that would be Definitive. That test is a Lab Test ( Not Rapid) and would NOT be subject to the samy misinterpretations as your Previous one.

-JC-

by ParanoidaboutHiv, Nov 10, 2009 10:36PM
To: JC
i'll wind up calling in for my results. i wont be able to not. i just hope the result isnt some mix up and they tell me i'm positive. i dont fully trust how they do things at that clinic. the counselor emailed me back today and told me that he thinks that the clinic has a "lousy batch of tests" . i hope he's right.
Post Comment
To
Comment
Post Comment
Recent Activity
Teak just shakes his head.
LIZZIE LOU atta boy :)
batbat8 commented on photo
10 hrs ago
opus88 commented on snow
14 hrs ago
benmacoboso joined this community
Welcome them!
14 hrs ago
aheart commented on photo
16 hrs ago
LIZZIE LOU commented on Tiger Woods behind th...
21 hrs ago
swampcritter commented on snow
21 hrs ago
RSS Expert Activity
What You Can Learn From Tiger Woods...
Dec 04 by Steven Y Park, MD
When the Mexican Drug Trade Hits th...
Dec 03 by Arnold L Goldman, D.V.M.
In the ER: Coffee, anyone?
Dec 02 by Jon Geller, D.V.M.
Community Members