We are closing this thread. Your questions have been answered thoroughly, and you have been told that you had no risk and no need to test.
Take care,
Emily
Thanks all for your replies. Just to give rest to my worries I want to do a final PCR test again. I already did DNA PCR twice with negative results. Which one is better PCR DNA or RNA in terms of accuracy?
Costwise RNA is more costly. Please suggest
It a protected sex with a csw but while removing condom I think some vaginal fluid touched the tip if penis(not foreskin).
Thanks. Symptoms for sure are not reliable but are these results 100% conclusive. Still CDC site says 6 months( first testing within 3 months and then 3 more months for 2nd testing).
The doctor I am going to is a very senior doctor and he told me that until 1 year you cannot be sure even if PCR is negative. Listening different informations makes me worry.
True HIV symptoms are only present from 2-4 weeks after an infection. Furthermore, not everyone who gets infected has symptoms anyway. Therefore, any symptoms you are having this long after your perceived risk are not related.
More than that, the only way HIV is diagnosed is by risk factor and HIV test results. No HIV doctor ever diagnoses an infection based on symptoms. For all of the reasons I've described, your symptoms are therefore irrelevant.
I never wanted to mention the symptoms coz it is non-specific but for the first time in my life I am facing this. All neuropathy related symptoms, cramps in leg, burnong sensation in feet and leg, extreme body twitching etc.
Can this really be anxiety? After seeing these results I was very happy but still these symptoms which started at 6-7 weeks are present and increasing day by day.
" posted here in same forum about testing positive after 3 months negative. "
You must be mistaken. If negative, then you can't be positive and there would be no purpose in testing. It is time to enjoy your life, instead of worrying about catching something that you don't have.