If you're SURE there was no penetration then you need no HIV testing.
There was no penetration I was asking if there had been...so no penetration you advise to get tested at 3 months and even with penetration you advise to get tested at 3 months?
I don't know what was exactly happening there, but if I were you I would get tested 3 months from then.
It was a while ago but he did not enter my anus. Like I said there was pressure but his penis was too small for penetration.
As long as the penis entered the anus even for a second, HIV risk might be there. Get yourself tested 3 months post-exposure, by which any negative result will be conclusive.
I don believe he penetrated me. I'm also asking: what kind of penetration and how long does penetration have to been to transmit? And is simply putting the penis in once and out enough to transmit the virus?
I should also mention again that I have been tested before (For previous encounters that were small risks or no risk as some would say) and it is not easy for my blood to be tested. Some weird reason the first time i got tested, they came back indeterminant twice then it went to a western blot and came back neg. My doctor said there is something about my blood that makes it hard for tests to read. I got tested later that year for peace of mind and a lab error resulted in a false positive! I did a confirmatory test (western blot) which came back negative. As you can see i am quite apprehensive to go through HIV testing.