Talked to my doctor today about wounds posing as risk. He said not to worry because a wound would need to be large and deep enough to enter the circulatory system. He said even small superficial cuts
and trivial blood exposures simply don't create a measurable risk. Like many persons, you seem to think that "just one virus" is enough to transmit the infection. That is not the case. Substantial amounts of infected blood or secretions have to be introduced into the body in a way that exposes certain cells to the virus. If HIV
Aside from that, are there other reasons?
My mind is telling me other factors could be superficial cuts don't have access to the bloodstream? That it is just superficial blood vessel in small cuts, scrapes and hangnails.
I really wonder how hard is it just to give someone a real answer. Honestly, some of us need more than just an answer like "NO RISK" or "IT"S JUST NOT THAT EASY"...I mean if you didn't have the knowledge like us, wouldn't you want a more indepth answer? That's just the nature of humans. And if you don't know, just say so!
So does that mean if there is blood and the wound DIDN'T REQUIRE STICHES...that that is only superficial blood vessels and not something that would lead to the bloodstream?