positive.
Much suspicious (lies, fraud, forgery...) circumstances surround his negative test results. His negative tests results have yet to be duplicated by any independent lab.
+, he would of course test Positive via ANTIBODY tests. Because has been infected for so long and produces antibodies, he would test NEGATIVE on ANTIGEN
tests. If he were on ANTIRETROVIRAL DRUGS and had an UNDETECTABLE VIRAL load, he would test NEGATIVE(UNDETECTABLE) on the VIRAL LOAD TEST. Tommy's people may use that VIRAL LOAD TEST to say he is "FREE of DISEASE". Based on the assay used, he can say he took the test and was NEGATIVE. This is a true statement as long as the test isn't an ANTIBODY assay.