any risk

I want to know whether my behaviors need a test for HIV or not.

1. Giving oral sex to a male of unknown status without ejaculation( likely to be positive)
2. Licking his balls -they are wet with precum
3.. deep kissing with him
4. most important part--while i lick his anal skin and anal hole with my tongue --there was a small wound that bleed slightly-not profusely

[avonelle38]

She has said "no risk" twice and yet you ask again "Really no risk?"  The answer is NO RISK! You can find false information anywhere on the internet. Most websites dedicated to HIV prevention and AIDS information are very overly conservative because they want to prevent the spread of the disease. BUT- the facts are that there has not been ONE single convincing documented case of HIV transmission through oral sex. What a website claims and what is actually reality are two drastically different things. The saliva in your mouth also renders HIV unable to infect. You were never at risk from this, and no matter what kind of "what if" questions you come up with, the facts do not change that oral sex is not a risk.

[LIZZIE LOU]

NO RISK

[kalaylayy]

why , some blood from his anal wound are in my mouth while doing licking and also precum.

[LIZZIE LOU]

NO RISK

[kalaylayy]

Really no risk even the most dangerous body fluid for HIV-THE BLOOD-reach inside the mouth?
In some sites, i found giving oral has some known cases even with precum without ejaculation?
Do I need to test?

[avonelle38]

She has said "no risk" twice and yet you ask again "Really no risk?"  The answer is NO RISK! You can find false information anywhere on the internet. Most websites dedicated to HIV prevention and AIDS information are very overly conservative because they want to prevent the spread of the disease. BUT- the facts are that there has not been ONE single convincing documented case of HIV transmission through oral sex. What a website claims and what is actually reality are two drastically different things. The saliva in your mouth also renders HIV unable to infect. You were never at risk from this, and no matter what kind of "what if" questions you come up with, the facts do not change that oral sex is not a risk.

[Yohji]

And if the semen has a very high viral load, is there any chance of contracting HIV through oral sex?

[kalaylayy]

if the wound bleeding was due to a certain STD,e.g herpes lesions, genital warts, chancre, etc....is the blood from such kinds of wound has more  chance to transmit?
kindly pls answer me
I don't know what type of wound on his anal skin.

[kalaylayy]

hi anyone please?

[joggen]

It's no risk whichever way you try to spin it. Nothing you can say will change the answer. There's no point in worrying about this when there are no confirmed cases of anybody being infected through oral sex.  You aren't going to be the first person to be infected that way.

That should do it for this thread. This forum has assessed your situation as not a risk for HIV- no test is necessary. Please refer to the rules at the top of the forum regarding excessive posting.

[kalaylayy]

if so, can I move on now with past exposure of the blood being inside my mouth from his wound?

[LIZZIE LOU]

* Anyone who continues to post excessively, questioning a conclusively negative result or no-risk situation, will be subject to action by MedHelp. Conclusively negative results or a no-risk situation will be based upon the criteria established by MedHelp’s doctors. Action will be taken as follows:
    * After excessive posting, a warning will be issued by MedHelp
    * Continuing to post regarding the negative result / no risk situation will result in a 3 day suspension
    * Continuing to post upon your return will result in a permanent ban.

[kalaylayy]

joggen
in joggen's answer,he said that
There's no point in worrying about this when there are no confirmed cases of anybody being infected through oral sex.  You aren't going to be the first person to be infected that way.
What do they mean?

[LIZZIE LOU]

* Anyone who continues to post excessively, questioning a conclusively negative result or no-risk situation, will be subject to action by MedHelp. Conclusively negative results or a no-risk situation will be based upon the criteria established by MedHelp’s doctors. Action will be taken as follows:
    * After excessive posting, a warning will be issued by MedHelp
    * Continuing to post regarding the negative result / no risk situation will result in a 3 day suspension
    * Continuing to post upon your return will result in a permanent ban.

[kalaylayy]

I understand his answer like this.
He said no risk because of no documented cases.
But can such documented cases are only be general?
for my exposure with blood that has highest concentration of HIV,why no risk?
morever, I have learned that HIV has been isolated in saliva but insufficient to give transmission.
But saliva itself contain HIV, is it possible to deactivate HIV from blood by the saliva?

[joggen]

* Anyone who continues to post excessively, questioning a conclusively negative result or no-risk situation, will be subject to action by MedHelp. Conclusively negative results or a no-risk situation will be based upon the criteria established by MedHelp’s doctors. Action will be taken as follows:
    * After excessive posting, a warning will be issued by MedHelp
    * Continuing to post regarding the negative result / no risk situation will result in a 3 day suspension
    * Continuing to post upon your return will result in a permanent ban.

[kalaylayy]

but now, one week after exposure, I suffer a mild sore throat.
IS it ARS?