You are not at risk for HIV
I mean i have no cuts or sores in finger
I mean negligible risk is not something i worried abt. Btw i do mot have cuts and sore on my finger
I did not mean that way. It was just confusing way canadian health agency presented it. Cdc does not consider it risk. So much information :)
Do you worry about negligible risk? Thanks do your self. Good luck.
Anyways thank you i will do some research
Ca health agency do mention it as negligible risk
We are not here to prove you. Better learn your self. This is not educational forum. Go and check the Internet about hiv transmission. Did they mentioned fingering? Do you think without proven they have published those information?
Thanks make sense. Is it has been proven scientifically? Any authentic material you know of that discuss this
Because you don't have blood in your finger. Unprotected anal or vaginal can transfer hiv into blood stream. If you have bleeding wound note down not a small cut. U should have bleed. Then you have risk. Did you had anything at the time? If no then No risk.
Because you don't have blood or other liquids in your finger. Unprotected anal or vaginal can transfer hiv into blood stream. If you have bleeding wound note down not a small cut. U should have bleed. Then you have risk. Did you had anything at the time? If no then No risk.
Vance. Thanks. Is it not fingering as act different thing then finger. By this logic every one have vagina and penis hiv can transmir so everyone should have hiv but they not as not every one is involved in risky act. So by fingering when we insert it fluids are there . No air is there but still fingering is not risk. Why
Because if HIV was transmitted by a finger then everyone would have HIV.
What is reason of this assumption or fact
Because it is a finger and HIV is not transmitted from a finger.