Because people, like Teak said, are uneducated and want "answers" as soon as possible. They don't want to wait the 3 month window period to be tested, so they do some research on HIV testing and read things about PCR tests or DNA tests being able to pick up infections much earlier than an antibody test... this is not really the case. A DNA test is not a diagnostic test, it can give many false positives, it is very expensive, and it really should only be used during a certain time frame after infection. The ONLY way to diagnose an HIV infection is with an antibody test done 3 or more months after exposure.
So why even test with that at all? Why even use in conjunction with HIV test. Was my earlier assessment on DNA testing correct.
Those that push DNA testing and those that pay the high cost of the test which will not diagnose recent exposures.