think about it. cuts start healing from the inside out...sealing off any pathway for infection.
hiv is a fragile virus...and it actually takes a substantial amount to infect. little cuts, scrapes, etc...do not pose a risk. period :)
Last question if you guys don't mind.
so you guys are saying that a person's cut should be big enough to see it constantly bleeding then its risk. otherwise those small cuts, scraps and wounds doesn't matter because they gets heeled quicker. right? thats why no risk?
thanks in advance
You were told wrong. After looking at your posting history I suggest you seek professional mental help.
I was told by a doctor that whenever blood is present its a risk.
That's exactly what I'm telling you. NO RISK.
I don't understand. If Blood is present and he had a slight cut or peeled skin, you're telling me he wasn't at risk?
No he wasn't at risk either.
Was the guy at risk for HIV? What if this woman had something and he had a cut on his finger. COuldn't he get infected from her blood? But I thought there was Zero risk with fingering?
trivial cuts, scrapes, and wounds do not pose a risk of transmitting hiv.