Dear all firstFirst of all thanks all of you you for the great work you are doing, My english is not good, I am 34 yrs married male from india, after 8 years of my routine
in his mouth & started to give me oral sex, i immidiatly asked him to stop released my semen out of his mouth, urinated & washed my penis , this whole exposure lasted even less than one minute, i checked there was no blood on my penis but i am not sure about his oral health, but he said later on there was no blood in his mouth & also mouth ulcer & beeding gums & there was no any cut on my penis also. after this i asked him about his hiv status & he said he is negative & though he is having multiple relationships he always practice safe sex. but i am doubtful, as he is always online on gay dating sites. this is the only one homo sexual exp in my life. After 79 days from this incident i tested for HIV1 & HIV 2 my result came negative, but my questions are as bellow,
1) have u ever seen somebody infected by insertive oral sex,
2) I got tested by using Tridot method, how reliable is Tridot method to detect antibodies after 72 days, as i have seen on many sites, that Tridot mehos is out dated or i should use some more standard tests,
3) In india everywhere , even in goverment hospitals they use tridot only & Western Blot for Confirmation
4) I need to test again after three months mark,
5) Have you seen any became positive after 72 days negative result,
6) Can i continue unprotected sex with my wife,
You were never at risk due to the exposure mentioned. Oral is a "NO RISK" activity, it is your guilt mounting your anxiety level up being a monogamous man loyal to his wife. Relax, you are safe,,, also rely on your test results,,, though you did not need them in first place
i think all of you answering me thinking my partner is hiv negative but if he is HIV positive with high viral load, so in that situation can saliva transmit hiv, or if he is having some amount of blood in his mouth which cannot be seen by eyes, so it can change the risk level
hey if there is no risk at all from oral sex & nobody even health professionals also has never seen hiv transmitted by insertive oral sex, then why they estimate risk is 1/20000 which is too high & in this situation testing is warranted
* Anyone who continues to post excessively, questioning a conclusive negative result or no-risk situation, will be subject to action by MedHelp. Conclusive negative results or a no-risk situation will be based up the criteria MedHelp’s doctors. Action will be taken as follows:
* After excessive posting, a warning will be issued by MedHelp
* Continuing to post regarding the negative result / no risk situation will result in a 3 day suspension
* Continuing to post upon your return will result in a permanent ban.
Dear Teak i want answer for my following question, i promise u i will never ask he question again
Q:- hey if there is no risk at all from oral sex & nobody even health professionals also has never seen hiv transmitted by insertive oral sex, then why they estimate risk is 1/20000 which is too high & in this situation testing is warranted
in all the recent studies done on hiv + ppl...who have had UNPROTECTED oral sex and protected sex...not one person contracted hiv. saliva is not infectious and contains over a dozen different enzymes and proteins that damage hiv and render it unable to infect.
you are NOT going to make history by becoming the first person ever to contract hiv from oral sex.
read this forum...it is full of oral sex questions and answers. your penis is just like all the other penises and our answers will not waiver.
Dear Teak after your last answer , i have talked to many agencies in india none of them have seen anybody got infected by oral sex in their personal practice, but they say oral sex is not complete risk free, even CDC & the sites like thebody.com also say though the risk is low but it is not risk free, what is your opinion
* Anyone who continues to post excessively, questioning a conclusive negative result or no-risk situation, will be subject to action by MedHelp. Conclusive negative results or a no-risk situation will be based up the criteria MedHelp’s doctors. Action will be taken as follows:
* After excessive posting, a warning will be issued by MedHelp
* Continuing to post regarding the negative result / no risk situation will result in a 3 day suspension
* Continuing to post upon your return will result in a permanent ban.
* Anyone who continues to post excessively, questioning a conclusive negative result or no-risk situation, will be subject to action by MedHelp. Conclusive negative results or a no-risk situation will be based up the criteria MedHelp’s doctors. Action will be taken as follows:
* After excessive posting, a warning will be issued by MedHelp
* Continuing to post regarding the negative result / no risk situation will result in a 3 day suspension
* Continuing to post upon your return will result in a permanent ban.
Dear Teak i respect you, insted of typinf this big warnig u could have given proper answer
* Anyone who continues to post excessively, questioning a conclusive negative result or no-risk situation, will be subject to action by MedHelp. Conclusive negative results or a no-risk situation will be based up the criteria MedHelp’s doctors. Action will be taken as follows:
* After excessive posting, a warning will be issued by MedHelp
* Continuing to post regarding the negative result / no risk situation will result in a 3 day suspension
* Continuing to post upon your return will result in a permanent ban.
i know both of you are having good knowledge about HIV
lets say Insertive partner is uncut and Insertive partners foreskin is damaged by catching teeth of the person who is sucking while he is performing..and lets think sucker has some blood in his mouth...Is there any chance to transmit HIV to Insertive partner this fresh little wound,,,