sorry!!!teak!last post!!!
please give me a link to this kind of study.....thank you so much!! please!!!
· Anyone who continues to post excessively, questioning a conclusive negative result or no-risk situation, will be subject to action by MedHelp. Conclusive negative results or a no-risk situation will be based up the criteria MedHelp’s doctors. Action will be taken as follows:
* After excessive posting, a warning will be issued by MedHelp
* Continuing to post regarding the negative result / no risk situation will result in a 3 day suspension
* Continuing to post upon your return will result in a permanent ban.
"First, I'm not sure that the HIV content of lubricating secretions from the Barthonlin and Skene's glands actually has been studied.
Second, there is no way to separate cervical secretions from lubricating fluid. Cervical secretions are produced continually by most women, and I would not assume that fluids near the vaginal opening come only from sexual lubrication; undoubtedly they usually (always?) include cervical secretions. "
jesus!! why just i can't get a no conflicting statement ....and this time is DrHHH!!!
your point?
what i have stated on this forum is that hiv has been found to be located way up in the vagina, at the cervix.
PLEASE stop with all this...enough is enough. really.
And what is your point? His agreement or non-agreement has nothing to do with what you have been told by this forum.
omg! Dr HHH seems don't agree with this statement!!!!!!
by H. Hunter Handsfield, M.D., Jun 13, 2008 03:20PM
Actually, I don't agree with that reasoning. First, I'm not sure that the HIV content of lubricating secretions from the Barthonlin and Skene's glands actually has been studied. Certainly if there were inflammation of those glands, as is common in STDs, those fluids almost certainly would contain HIV -- and HIV might be there all the time anyway. Second, there is no way to separate cervical secretions from lubricating fluid. Cervical secretions are produced continually by most women, and I would not assume that fluids near the vaginal opening come only from sexual lubrication; undoubtedly they usually (always?) include cervical secretions.
None of this changes the fact that HIV transmission never occurs by hand-genital contact, including masturbation with vaginal fluid as lubricant. But the reason probably has more to do with the amount of HIV from such exposure, not the origin of the woman's secretions.
http://www.medhelp.org/posts/HIV-Prevention/vaginal-fluid-in-urethra-through-mutual-masturbation/show/543093
but i can't find some articles publised.could you pls give me a link? ;))
i promise i won't post anymore....
facts are facts. our answers do not change because of someone's anxiety.
kindly move on...
sorry to bother you so much Lizzie ;)
i just want get some double check to ease my mind...
oral sex is not a risk no matter where your tongue is ! ! ! ! !
so Lizzie ,you and teak agree with this?
am i right?
the infectious fluid only exist in the cervical area,and if you don't put your tongue really in the virgina ,you can't get touched with the infectious fluid?
i have stated this many times on this forum.
do you agree with that? teak ;)
is this statement medically right?