hey, i was reading through Dr. Bob's archives on thebody.com, and some of the other doctors/experts there have said in replies that "microscopic tears and cuts
that im almost sure wasnt bleeding as well as a torn cuticle on my thumb) and he said i should get a single antibody test done at 3 months post exposure to rule out all possibility. is this really necessary?! granted, i am a little worried about it as i dont know the status of the other person whose blood got on me, but could i really have gotten HIV?? he also said i should be tested for hepatitis C! in all the posts here i have read the cut must be actively bleeding and a significant amount of blood must get directly into the cut. why are the other experts at thebody.com saying elsewise? are they being very conservative to save their butts?? im extremely worried now. any advice would be so appreciated
Don't care what you read on The Body. This is a totally different website.
* Anyone who continues to post excessively, questioning a conclusively negative result or no-risk situation, will be subject to action by MedHelp. Conclusively negative results or a no-risk situation will be based upon the criteria established by MedHelp’s doctors. Action will be taken as follows:
* After excessive posting, a warning will be issued by MedHelp
* Continuing to post regarding the negative result / no risk situation will result in a 3 day suspension
* Continuing to post upon your return will result in a permanent ban.
hi im sorry ive seemed to anger you, i dont understand why i got this warning? my question wasn't answered and i would really appreciate a reply. im sorry to ask again, my apologies for upsetting anyone.