you are sooooooooooo letting your anxiety control your thoughts. YOU NEVER EVEN STUCK YOURSELF ! ! ! ! !
hiv becomes inactive when exposed to air. it is NOT transmitted from environmental surfaces or inanimate objects.
as i said earlier...YOU HAD NO RISK
thanks lizzie,
so can i put this behind me and move on with my life?
i beleive in what you say so are you sure this is a no risk situation, if we suppose it as a needlestick by lancet which occured about 2 minutes after being used by another person?
sorry for writing too much , and thanks again,
lancets are NOT hollow bore needles where blood can be trapped.
no documented cases
and i repeat my question i asked teak: are you aware of documented cases of hiv transmission via lancets? plz answer this too..thanks
thanks lizzie, but why healthcare workers should test for hiv if they are poked with needles? what is the difference?
and finally tell me if i can REALLY forget about this event? i have a wife and don't want to put her at risk.
no, i did not prick her finger with a used lancet! it was a new lancet. but after she tested, i touched the lancet needle (in fact playing with it!) by mistake and non intentionally. i am not sure about being poked by it or not because i don't remember any pain but i didn't check it for blood drops. any risk?
hhhuuummmm...strange story...very strange story.
so what you are saying that you pricked someone's finger with a USED lancet? and then you "touched" the lancet?
i know you have good information in hiv transmission documented cases. how many reported cases exist about hiv transmission via lancets? any estimates? any source or website link?
but i have heard that if a healthworker pokes himself with a needle, he should test for hiv even at 6 months. is this true? and what is the difference?
You didn't have an exposure either.