possible to get neg oraquick and + elisa?

[crazyinmyhead]

received unprotected cunnilingus 5 months ago....
tested last tuesday with elisa...results not in yet. (Lab said they'd only call if test comes back + or indeterminate...now I'm scared to death everytime my phone rings.)
tested the following day, Wednesday, with oraquick finger stick....negative. Now I'm concerned about a false + or indeterminate elisa..can't mentally handle it. Is this possible if I've tested negative with oraquick?  
also have read A LOT of contradictory things on oral sex and transmission........would be nice to get this cleared up.

[Besos]

Hi,
Do u have any idea about the reliability of easykit hiv test (http://www.easykit.info/index.php ). The web site dont seems to me credible and the prices are curiosly low. Do you have somme informations about it ???

[Besos]

thank's a lot I think the easykit is totaly home test, but not home acess even it's approved by FDA. My problem is to wait days from results ...

[Besos]

but home access is not 100 % home test, i mean you have to send the a blood specimen to a lab and wait for results. Is it right ?

[Besos]

hi, So is ther any other home hiv test available in drug stores ?

[Teak]

No you cannot get an oraquick test to use at home.

[Besos]

Hi,
I'm from Montreal, I want to know how can I get Oraquicks HIV test to use it at home. Is it available in drug stores, in Canada or USA ?

Thank's!

Hugo

[txtony]

your negative hiv oraquick is very reliable. your negative.
however, oraquicks have a high rate of false positive, not the elisa standard blood test.  dont worry, your results wont come out positive.
plus as everyone stated, receiving cunnulingus risk is remote at best.
plus your negative oraquick at 5 mos.
cdc is conservative and state their window is now 3 mos, down from 6 mos.
even if the sites are wrong that cunnulingus is no risk, you still had/have a negative hiv test under your belt. your home free.

[mike_no]

Okay, you have to understand this

Practicaly, NO risk

Theoritically, very very very low risk

How many people have you come across(read about) acquiring HIV through an incidence like this?

If you find out the answer of my question,I'm sure you'd agree to my point "NO RISK"

[worriedmang]

In my opinion, thats incredibly irresponsible of them to say that they only call if the results are positive or indeterminate. Results should only be given in person by a doctor, whether positive or negative, those are the rules in British Columbia where I live. I feel terrible for you, you must be just going nuts every time the phone rings. If you ever get a test somewhere else, you should go to a more responsible clinic.

[Joe C]

Cunnilingus = NO RISK

Anything can happen in theory, but in the real world of HIV transmission it just doesn't happen that way.

And stop being afraid of the phone. Next time it rings run to it so you can get your negative result and move on with your life. You are really worrying over nothing.

[crazyinmyhead]

No risk from unprotected cunnilingus?  or low risk?
if you're saying zero risk whatsoever, there are a lot of websites that have wrong info posted.....
thanks for your quick response to my original post :)

[mike_no]

Received unprotected cunnilingus --> NO RISK

Testing was not required

If oraquick's yeilded a negative , it is negative