This is your last answer on this thread.
HIV cannot pass through intact skin, even when there are acne lesions. You don't know the phlebotomist's risk behaviors therefore you do not know how she contracted HIV.
HIV has never been transmitted through kissing or casual contact.
Post one more question and you will be reported to MedHelp.
PPL WILL LIE ABOUT THEIR EXPOSURES.
let's just say that this girl was married and had cheated on her husband. easy to blame to blood splatter.
what if you are a married man who had cheated and had sex with another MAN. would you admit to the world that you had PENETRATION...or try to downplay it by saying it was just oral sex.
PPL WILL LIE ABOUT THEIR EXPOSURES
sounds like a copout joggen
"Conclusive negative results or a no-risk situation will be based up the criteria MedHelp’s doctors."
Hi
i did research on a reputable site and found something similar to my concerns. the nurse appears to have been infected when blood splashed onto a pimple. how did you conclude "no-risk situation" when my research suggests otherwise.
* Anyone who continues to post excessively, questioning a conclusive negative result or no-risk situation, will be subject to action by MedHelp. Conclusive negative results or a no-risk situation will be based up the criteria MedHelp’s doctors. Action will be taken as follows:
* After excessive posting, a warning will be issued by MedHelp
* Continuing to post regarding the negative result / no risk situation will result in a 3 day suspension
* Continuing to post upon your return will result in a permanent ban.
this is from the CDC
Health-Care Worker 2: A female phlebotomist was filling a 10 ml vacuum blood collection tube with blood from an outpatient with a suspected HIV infection when the top of the tube flew off and blood splattered around the room, on her face, and in her mouth. She was wearing gloves to protect her hands and was wearing eyeglasses so she did not think she got any blood in her eyes. She had facial acne but no open wounds. She washed the blood off immediately after the exposure. The outpatient's blood sample was positive for HIV antibody by EIA and Western blot, and a hepatitis B surface antigen test was negative. The phlebotomist's EIA was negative the day after the incident and again 8 weeks later. When she donated blood 9 months after the exposure, she was positive for HIV antibody by EIA and Western blot (bands p24 and gp41). She has had no symptoms. She denied having any sexual contact during the previous 2 years,ever using drugs intravenously, or ever receiving a transfusion. Two months after the incident, she scratched the back of her hand with a needle used to draw blood from an intravenous drug abuser of unknown HIV-antibody status. She did not bleed as a result of the scratch and has not had any needle-stick injuries in over 2 years. Her serologic tests for syphilis and hepatitis B were negative. A coworker who was splattered with blood on the face and in the mouth during the same incident remains seronegative 1 year after the incident.
It would appear she got HIV from blood splashed on facial acne that was not open. is this possible? can HIV pass through acne. doesnt there have to be damage to the acne on the face for hiv to pass through. reading this would suggest my daughter was at risk when blood touched the acne on her face which may have had a hole in it.
That was "Forum" not form, just a typo...
And i Thought my concerns were Wierd !!! lol what a shame indeed!!!
PPL PPL *PLEASE* educate yourself a bit about HIV/AIDS before you post a ridiculous question here on the form and cause an embarrassment for others as well as yourself!
I think some people should just put themselves in bubbles, it would be easier.
Sheesh.
I understand aussiet, i have a friend freaking out about her 7 year old son who drank after his aunt who has aids and was not on any medication at that time. she wants to know if he is at risk for contracting the virus because in 4 days he had a sore throat, headache and fever.
FROM THE MOUTH OF DR HANSFIELD:
"HIV isn't so easily transmitted. Minor cuts and trivial blood exposures simply don't create a measurable risk. Like many persons, you seem to think that "just one virus" is enough to transmit the infection. That is not the case. Substantial amounts of infected blood or secretions have to be introduced into the body in a way that exposes certain cells to the virus. If HIV could be transmitted in the ways you are worrying about, AIDS would be 100 times more common than it is and would not be classified as an STD."
Hi
why are trivial cuts, scrapes, and scratches no risk? isnt it still an opening for the virus? and what is trivial. also, when you talk about cuts, scrapes, and scratches does it apply to your face as well as the rest of your body, or only fingers. I am just trying to understand.
Thanks.
The very first reply told you why.
Hi, i understand you get what are in your eyes lots of non risk posts, however, i really would like to know why it was a non risk event and what would have made it risky.If you dont have the time to answer i would appreciate it if you could direct me to some commentary that would put my mind at ease. Thank you.
Then I suggest you seek professional mental help for your phobias.
Thanks for the reply. i understand what youre saying, but its my little girl and i cant but worry. if i assume the worst, blood on lips in contact with fresh wound on face (it was actually on the bridge of her nose) why isnt it a risk when most hiv commentary says youre at risk whenever an open wound is in contact with blood. Is it because the wound was not deep enough to be a viable point of entry?
HIV is transmitted by UNPROTECTED SEX or sharing works with other IV drug abusers. Your kids were never at risk.