Member Comments are provided by individuals and reflect their personal opinions only. Under NO circumstances should you act on any advice or opinion posted in this forum. ALWAYS check with your personal physician before taking any action regarding your health! MedHelp International and our partners, sponsors and affiliates have no obligation to monitor any comments posted on this site, or the content and/or accuracy of such exchanges. MedHelp International does not endorse the views of any user.
Heart Disease (Expert Forum)
25% Ejection Fraction Prognosis
This forum is for questions and support regarding heart issues such as: Angina, Angioplasty, Arrhythmia, Bypass Surgery, Cardiomyopathy, Coronary Artery Disease, Defibrillator, Heart Attack, Heart Disease, High Blood Pressure, Mitral Valve Prolapse, Pacemaker, PAD, Stenosis, Stress Tests.
25% Ejection Fraction Prognosis
by micam, Aug 18, 2004 12:00AM
I just moved to Japan and have yet to find a cardiologist, please excuse the long post. Some history: 44 years old, AMI in October 2001, 40% of my heart dead. At first, my EF was around 50%. Around Mar 2003 I stopped exercising regimen and gained weight. By Dec 2003 I went from 75 kg to 94 kg. The results of an Apr 2004 stress echo were
"clinically and electrically negative. There were no ischemic ST changes and no arrythmias. Baseline ejection fraction was 25% with normally contracting basal segments of anterolateral and posterior walls. All other segments were severely hypokinetic or akinetic. At peak heart rate his ejection fraction was 30% with a hyperdynamic wall motion of the basal segments. There were no other changes. The study was interpreted as no inducible ischemia. There was an apical aneurysm with small apical laminated thrombus. There were basal and mid anterolateral segments which showed normal contractility but otherwise all walls were severely hypokinetic to akinetic. There were mild mitral regurgitation."
This Apr I began a cardiac rehab program, am back to 77 kg and jogging 5km per day. My doctor's report before leaving Canada: "Blood pressure 102/60, pulse 70 and regular, chest clear. Jugular venous pressure low and no edema. He had an S4 and no murmurs."
Questions: Will my EF improve? Is 25% cause for concern? I have frequent palpitations but no other symptoms. Could my EF slide further despite the meds and exercise? Is there anything I can do to improve my prognosis?
Meds: Lipitor 20 daily, Altace 5 BID, Carvedilol 6.25 BID, Lasix, ASA 81.
THX!
"clinically and electrically negative. There were no ischemic ST changes and no arrythmias. Baseline ejection fraction was 25% with normally contracting basal segments of anterolateral and posterior walls. All other segments were severely hypokinetic or akinetic. At peak heart rate his ejection fraction was 30% with a hyperdynamic wall motion of the basal segments. There were no other changes. The study was interpreted as no inducible ischemia. There was an apical aneurysm with small apical laminated thrombus. There were basal and mid anterolateral segments which showed normal contractility but otherwise all walls were severely hypokinetic to akinetic. There were mild mitral regurgitation."
This Apr I began a cardiac rehab program, am back to 77 kg and jogging 5km per day. My doctor's report before leaving Canada: "Blood pressure 102/60, pulse 70 and regular, chest clear. Jugular venous pressure low and no edema. He had an S4 and no murmurs."
Questions: Will my EF improve? Is 25% cause for concern? I have frequent palpitations but no other symptoms. Could my EF slide further despite the meds and exercise? Is there anything I can do to improve my prognosis?
Meds: Lipitor 20 daily, Altace 5 BID, Carvedilol 6.25 BID, Lasix, ASA 81.
THX!
Doctor's Answer
by CCF-M.D.-MJM, Aug 18, 2004 12:00AM
Hi Micam,
Let's address your questions in order.
1. Will my EF improve? It will probably not improve. There is sometimes some improvement in EF after an MI, but not 2-3 years afterward.
2. Is 25% cause for concern? At this point it boils down to risk factor modification. You need to reduce your risk of future problems as much as possible. The hardest one for people to comply with is NO SMOKING. Smoking is more dangerous if you have known coronary heart disease.
You should be on certain medications that are shown to decrease your risk of future events: beta blockers, ACEI, aspirin, aldactone if you have heart failure symptoms. Unless you have a contraindication, you should be on the highest dose of a statin that you can tolerate. I am refraining from using industry names of medications, of course we all have our preferences.
If you have an ejection fraction less than 30% and have had a heart attack, you should have an implantable defibrillator. They save lives!
3. Could my EF slide further despite the meds and exercise? It could, but if it does, you doctor should look for the reason why. It may suggest there are more blockages.
Your medications look good. I would increase the dose of carvedilol as much as you can tolerate and increase the dose of lipator (atorvastatin) as close to 80 as possible. All medication changes under the supervision of your doctor of coarse.
Look into an implantable cardiac defibrillator. It sounds like you are a candidate.
I think I already answered your 4th question above.
Good luck and thanks for posting.
Let's address your questions in order.
1. Will my EF improve? It will probably not improve. There is sometimes some improvement in EF after an MI, but not 2-3 years afterward.
2. Is 25% cause for concern? At this point it boils down to risk factor modification. You need to reduce your risk of future problems as much as possible. The hardest one for people to comply with is NO SMOKING. Smoking is more dangerous if you have known coronary heart disease.
You should be on certain medications that are shown to decrease your risk of future events: beta blockers, ACEI, aspirin, aldactone if you have heart failure symptoms. Unless you have a contraindication, you should be on the highest dose of a statin that you can tolerate. I am refraining from using industry names of medications, of course we all have our preferences.
If you have an ejection fraction less than 30% and have had a heart attack, you should have an implantable defibrillator. They save lives!
3. Could my EF slide further despite the meds and exercise? It could, but if it does, you doctor should look for the reason why. It may suggest there are more blockages.
Your medications look good. I would increase the dose of carvedilol as much as you can tolerate and increase the dose of lipator (atorvastatin) as close to 80 as possible. All medication changes under the supervision of your doctor of coarse.
Look into an implantable cardiac defibrillator. It sounds like you are a candidate.
I think I already answered your 4th question above.
Good luck and thanks for posting.
Member Comments (1)
by vdegraziasanders, Dec 07, 2008 02:17PM
A related discussion, EF of 25%- Good surgical risk? was started.
by jack1246, Jun 10, 2009 06:35AM
A related discussion, Heart ejection fraction was started.
