HEART DISEASE COMMUNITY
80 % BLOCKAGE IN LAD

80 % BLOCKAGE IN LAD

I am 45 Years old , recently had MI. After Angeography 80 % & 60 % blockage found in MID LAD. Doctor suggested for Angeoplastry.
But I hv no physical problem such as angina , fatigue and headack etc. I do not want to go for angeoplastry. pls suggest. what will be the better option for me.
My BP, Suger and collastral level is normal.

Pls suggest what are the risk factor, if i do not go for angeoplastry.
Related Discussions
6 Comments Post a Comment
Blank
976897_tn?1317787410
There is something that you could request first, a nuclear perfusion scan. This will see if your heart tissue is well oxygenated on the left side and could indicate development of collateral vessels which act as natural bypass vessels. If you have developed these then it may explain why you have no angina symptoms.
Now, there are a couple of things that I am confused about. You say you had MI, yet you have no angina. Does this mean they inserted a stent somewhere? or you are finding that medication has helped?
In some people, an MI attack causes collateral vessels to quickly open and start to function. Maybe this is what has happened with you but a scan is required to be sure. Have you been put on any medication such as nitrates or beta blockers because these will help matters. However, stopping the medication will cause the symptoms to return. If you have no collateral development, I would (taking your age into account) have intervention in the form of angioplasty. The left artery is not something to take lightly, if it blocks and you have no collaterals, it is usually good bye.
Blank
Avatar_m_tn
Hi Ed,

I have not gone through any stent.My doctor says that i got tretment at earliar stage.The clot is dissolved and the blood flow is through in that artry .I am taking Betaloc,clopivas,nitrocontin,atorva,pantop,revotril plus.
I only had a mild chest pain during attack.After that I had no physical problem.Echo report shows lvpf in mode is 68%.
I am confused,if I am not having any physical problem,than why should I go for plasty?Please suggest.
Blank
976897_tn?1317787410
Basically because anything above a 70% blockage is seen as dangerous. This is because it is more likely to errupt and cause a life threatening clot.
Blank
1375523_tn?1279538124
I also would suggest you to go ahead with angioplasty, as LAD is not the area where we have to experiment..
Blank
Post a Comment
To
Comment
Post A Comment
Go
Blank
Heart Rhythm Tracker
Log your arrhythmias
Start Tracking Now
Blank
Cholesterol Tracker
Log cholesterol over time
Start Tracking Now
MedHelp Health Answers
Submit
Top Heart Disease Answerers
63984_tn?1333142839
Blank
Flycaster305
OR
976897_tn?1317787410
Blank
ed34
watford, United Kingdom
159619_tn?1318997813
Blank
erijon
Salt Lake City, UT
237039_tn?1264261657
Blank
ChatterAlly
Lake Jackson, TX
187666_tn?1331176945
Blank
ireneo
Portland, OR
Avatar_m_tn
Blank
curmudgen
Bar Harbor , ME
RSS Expert Activity
1741471_tn?1336957856
Blank
LIVE WEBINAR TOMORROW!-SUPER BODY, ... Blank
May 22 by Michael Gonzalez-WallaceBlank
2126606_tn?1335910182
Blank
Fibromyalgia Awareness
May 11 by Clare Waismann Kavin, RASBlank
2126606_tn?1335910182
Blank
Opioid-induced hyperalgesia reduces...
May 03 by Clare Waismann Kavin, RASBlank