va_tony,
Thanks for the well-informed post.
Q1:" What is the success rate of rf ablation at the Cleveland Clinic for those having afib with such large atrial enlargement? "
Our success rate is 80-85% for all-comers, but some factors certainly decrease our success rate. Chronic afib and atrial enlargement are two of those factors. An LA size of 5.2 cm is certainly large, but we have seen much larger. I don't have the data available to me to tell you how the success rate drops for each increment in LA size.
Q2:"wouldn't the continued presence of the enlarged atrium make the patient susceptible to an easy return of afib sometime in the future, whenever another stray foci develops?"
Yes. To help counter this fact, many centers add a "substrate modification" portion to the ablation procedure to help counterbalance the disadavantage caused by the atrial enlargement.
Q3:"Is there an overall strategy that one can follow to reduce the size of the atrium?"
Treatment of high blood pressure and maintenance of sinus rhythm are two good first steps. After that it's the usual things like stopping swearing, calling your mom, going to church (temple, synagogue, mosque), etc.
Q4:"This was disappointing because I thought the weight loss, bp drop and return to NSR would cause the atrium to contract somewhat. I do also have some slight mitral valve regurgitation but my cardiologist feels that this wasn't the cause of the enlargement. Any comment?"
Give the atrium a chance! It may take some time to remodel. Also, getting a good quality echo may help ensure that the valvular regurgitation is not contributing. Make sure that the cardiologist feels the echo was of sufficient quality.
Best of luck.
Thanks also to dquenzer (doug), who suggested contacting medhelp.org on the Arrhythmia Forum of HeartCenterOnline. Doug also advised on the best time to call, which helped me get through on my second try! Hi Momto3 (alias conniezee),also from HeartCenterOnline. I can see why Momto3 and dquenzer post here frequently. This is a neat forum!
Thanks.
Steve
I performed a google search. If I understand correctly, "substrate modification" seems to be an rf ablative procedure that can be performed at the same time as the usual ablative surgery - - i.e., simultaneously with ablation of stray foci and pulmonary vein isolation (see http://www.ipej.org/0304/knight.htm ). It consists of making long linear rf-induced lesions on the atrium to electrically isolate different portions and so stop the formation of reentrant wavelets (see http://www.bnk.de/herz/en/1926_3121.htm).
Tony
I also wondered about this. The same objections must apply to the Maze procedure, since that involves scarring the external surface of the atria. Electrically isolating different portions of the atrium would, at first glance, seem to spoil its ability to pump. One article I came across seemed to imply that an electrical pulse traverses the lesion with a time delay rather than being blocked. Unfortunately, the article just mentioned that fact in passing. A time delay might still allow atrial pumping (depending on the time scales involved) yet spoil the ability of reentry loops to sustain themselves. As for scarring, that's known to be a source of extraneous electrical pulses that are potential triggers for PACs. Yes, this certainly raises a number of follow-up questions.
Are there any posters out there who have had "substrate modification" performed during their ablations?
Tony