Thanks so much for the answer. So basically it can be hard to determine with the stephoscope alone if I have aortic insuffeincy or not right?
But you say the cardiologist should be able to tell with the stephoscope if I have AI and how severe it is just by the sound? How accurate can that be? Are we talking 50% accuracy or what? Or is a echocardiogram really needed to see how severe it is. Because if you can hear the AI can it still be trace to mild amounts?
Thanks again!
Murmurs are often difficult to distinguish, especially by non-cardiologists. The ER doc may have heard a flow murmur because of white coat syndrome and tachycardia. That's a benign finding. Since there is no dissection and the aorta looked normal the likelihood of any pathology in the aortic valve is very low. An echo would be the most definitive test to look for any AI. Of course, I think you should see a cardiologist, who by listening alone should be able to tell whether or not there is any AI. As far as the severity goes, again, a cardiologist will be able to tell the severity of AI based on the exam alone. The echo also helps. The relationship between AI and HTN and tachycardia is somewhat complex and unpredictable, and I don't think that at a HR of 150 beats per minute anyone would be able to appreciate AI at all, let alone be able to judge its severity. I would therefore not be very concerned about what was told in the ER. If you are very concerned and knowing for sure will put you at ease I would recommend seeing a cardiologist.