The rupture risk of AAAs is the most natural intervention indication, and currently minimal invasive (EVAR) or surgical interventions are available effectively treat such diseased portions of the aorta. The treatment itself is highly successful; however, these are major (expensive) interventions and naturally associated with diverse risks for the patients. According to different guidelines rupture risk is estimated from the AAA’s largest diameter and different trials came up with different threshold values (5.0cm , 5.5 cm,…). The weakness of such an approach, however, is indicated by the fact that up to 30% of AAAs rupture although below such thresholds and it is known that the actual shape of the aneurysm matters most. The geometry of AAAs is highly diverse, and hence, a single diameter measure cannot reflect that. Already 10 years ago powerful hypothetical models (based on the Finite Element Method) demonstrated that one can do better! In details, patient specific computer models of the aneurysm are used to predict the mechanical loading in the wall, which in turn reflects its rupture risk. Different research groups all around the world demonstrated that this approach is superior to assessing the rupture risk from the aneurysm’s largest diameter. However such approaches are not seen in clinical practice at all, although they cannot just avoid human tragedies but also save money.
So my question is why does no one apply this new method?
Copyright 1994-2016 MedHelp International. All rights reserved.
MedHelp is a division of Aptus Health.
This site complies with the HONcode standard for trustworthy health information.
The Content on this Site is presented in a summary fashion, and is intended to be used for educational and entertainment purposes only. It is not intended to be and should not be interpreted as medical advice or a diagnosis of any health or fitness problem, condition or disease; or a recommendation for a specific test, doctor, care provider, procedure, treatment plan, product, or course of action. Med Help International, Inc. is not a medical or healthcare provider and your use of this Site does not create a doctor / patient relationship. We disclaim all responsibility for the professional qualifications and licensing of, and services provided by, any physician or other health providers posting on or otherwise referred to on this Site and/or any Third Party Site. Never disregard the medical advice of your physician or health professional, or delay in seeking such advice, because of something you read on this Site. We offer this Site AS IS and without any warranties. By using this Site you agree to the following Terms and Conditions. If you think you may have a medical emergency, call your physician or 911 immediately.