I think your assessment is right on the money -- although I would seek the second opinion of a cardiologist, not a surgeon. Surgeons are very good at a surgery but leave it to the cardiologist to help you decide when you need to have a surgical repair/ replacement of your bicuspid aortic valve (BAV). You are correct, you will likely need an aortic root replacement at the time of surgery. People with bicuspid aortic valves are at increased risk for aneurysms and dissections.
When you seek a second opinion, it is VERY important that they have the old echo film/tape and not just a report so they can assess for themself the degree of progression.
You are also correct that your risk of dissection is currently remote, but will increase as the size of your aortic root increases over time. The most important thing for now is that you have symptoms from your leaking valve and this is why I think a second opinion with a cardiologist will help.
From what you describe about your self this is a relatively low risk procedure in the hands of an experienced operator (this is my politically correct way of saying that if you need surgery, make sure your surgeon is exerienced).
I was wondering if you had an echo before he did the Tee. I also have BAV and have been having chest pains. I had to have a Tee to be diagnosed, they couldn't tell by the echo. When I went for my yearly check up he just did an echo and said that there was some change but not enough to do anything about it yet. I wonder why he could tell this on a plain echo and not sending me for the Tee like he did when he first suspected BAV. My doc doesn't give me the exact measurements like you have, did you request that or did he just offer it to you. I would appreciate your thoughts. Terri
I think you need to find a surgeon who is experienced with aortic dissection, and does aortic root replacement and talk to him/her for another pov. I am a 59 year old female who recently (May 11th) underwent open heart surgery to have my aortic root replaced. I was measured at 4.5cm at the time. The cardiologist took a "let's watch it" approach while the surgeon felt I should have the surgery asap, at a time when I was in good health. But I also had a family history to share. I had a paternal Aunt who dissected in 1985. She nearly died but did survive the surgery and lived to be 80 dying from cancer, not heart disease. But back then no one informed our family that there could be a genetic connection.
In 2001, a paternal male cousin, age 51, dissected and died, and three years later my sister dissected and died. We did not know that my male cousin had an aortic root aneurysm until autopsy. My sister had an aortic root aneurysm of 4.5 and dissected. She died in the ER. My surgeon considers it still to be a gray area when it comes to this aortic problem. I had to make the decision whether to watch or do something. My recovery was smooth. I was walking two miles just two weeks after surgery and by four weeks I felt back to normal. It was worth it for me to have peace of mind.
Good luck to you in whatever you choose.
Thank you for the responses. I am comfortable with the guidance of my current cardioligist, we have had a good relationship so far and he is highly regarded. I had some concern that he was not being aggressive enough but feel more comfortable following his continued guidance from your response.
mbimom - I have been having annual echoes for many years now. I always go for my echo first, get the results mailed to me, write any questions I have and bring it all with me to my appointment and review it with my doctor. That is why I am able to get the numbers.
My TEE was not a normally scheduled appointment, it came just 3 months after my last one because of a sudden onset of symptoms when I had never had any before. There was a stark difference between the 2 tests (echo and TEE) but my Dr told me it may have been like that for some time but just not picked up by the echo.
Jjc2005 - thanks for the response. We have no family history of heart related issues on either side of my family. Not sure where I got my wonderful genetics from.
I too have a bi-cuspid aorta valve. In my annual checkup with my primary doctor, an echo showed I had a 4.5 cm aneurysm and a CT was scheduled. I had the CT scan where a dye was used and the actual measurement of the aortic aneurysm is 4.8 cm and I was forwarded to a cardiologist.
He went over the results with me, and although he did a good job explaining things to me, I now have tons of additional questions that he was not too concerned with. He said eventually, I will need to have surgery to replace the valve and he placed me on Metoprolol Tartrate...a beta blocker, two times a day, of 50mg each for the first 30 days.
He told me I had two goals, one to keep my blood pressure down and 2nd, keep my heart rate down. I told him I work out vigoursly at the gym 5 days a week for a solid 90 minutes each. He said that was ok. How does one work out while keeping your BPM lows?
Anyway, is open heart surgery the only alternative.
Is there an immediate need to do this now?
Am I really in great danger?
He told me he'd see me in 6 months and take another ct scan then. My family is freaking out thinking there is a time bomb in there, and that I should schedule open heart surgery ASAP.
I'm 53 years old and in perfect health, other than hypothroidism that I've had for 30 years.
Your thougths please?????????????????
Doctor told me that mri/mra is "gold standard" for aortic root and ascending aorta (aneurysm & dissection) assesment. Why was CT scan done instead of MRI? Where is your 4.5 or 4.8 aneurysm located and what is your acceptable heart pulse rate as well blood pressure during 90 minutes of exercise according to your doctor and cardiologist?My cardiologist does not allow vigourus exerise for persons with aortic root and/or ascending aorta measuring over 4 cm.
Copyright 1994-2017MedHelp International.All rights reserved. MedHelp is a division of Aptus Health.
The Content on this Site is presented in a summary fashion, and is intended to be used for educational and entertainment purposes only. It is not intended to be and should not be interpreted as medical advice or a diagnosis of any health or fitness problem, condition or disease; or a recommendation for a specific test, doctor, care provider, procedure, treatment plan, product, or course of action. Med Help International, Inc. is not a medical or healthcare provider and your use of this Site does not create a doctor / patient relationship. We disclaim all responsibility for the professional qualifications and licensing of, and services provided by, any physician or other health providers posting on or otherwise referred to on this Site and/or any Third Party Site. Never disregard the medical advice of your physician or health professional, or delay in seeking such advice, because of something you read on this Site. We offer this Site AS IS and without any warranties. By using this Site you agree to the following Terms and Conditions. If you think you may have a medical emergency, call your physician or 911 immediately.