Member Comments are provided by individuals and reflect their personal opinions only. Under NO circumstances should you act on any advice or opinion posted in this forum.  ALWAYS check with your personal physician before taking any action regarding your health! MedHelp International and our partners, sponsors and affiliates have no obligation to monitor any comments posted on this site, or the content and/or accuracy of such exchanges. MedHelp International does not endorse the views of any user.
 | 

Calcium in coronary artery

by auugmobile, May 19, 2007 12:00AM
Is calcium in coronary artery and plaque the same?  My husband had a EBCT recently which found a large amount of calcium in r. coronary artery.  He had MI last  June and has stent in L. side.
(Sorry, I can not remember which artery) The radiologist said the r. artery is approx 50% blocked.  I have read that a lower percentage of blockage is worse than a higher blockage, i.e.  80-90%.  What is your opinion? Thank you.
Member Comments (6)

by anacyde, May 19, 2007 12:00AM
The higher percentage of a blockage is worse.  If something is 50% blocked, bloodflow is better than if it's 80% blocked.

I believe calcium and blockages are of the same vein.

by va_tony, May 20, 2007 12:00AM
"Is calcium in coronary artery and plaque the same?"

I'm not an expert but have just sarted reading since I also was recently told I have a high calcium score (CAC = 730). Yes, calcium in the coronary arteries and plaque are the same. The plaque can be hard or soft.  Both forms are dangerous. Usually, a higher calcium reading correlates with increased blockages.  The more an artery is blocked (measured in percentage) the worse it is.  In my case although I had a high calcium score, a CT-angiogram spotted only three small partial blockages (<30%). So apparently, the calcium can be spread out over a large area and not necessarily cause a significant blockage.  Still, statistics show that a high calcium score is predictive of increased chance of a heart attack.

I hope your husband is on a statin to reduce cholesterol.  Studies show that lowering cholesterol leads to lowering of the calcium scores over time. I just started with lipitor and after a month my total cholesterol dropped from 210 to 131.

Best of luck

Tony

by anacyde, May 22, 2007 12:00AM
To: va_tony
Awesome!

by va_tony, May 22, 2007 12:00AM
To: Anacyde
Yes, I was pretty happy when I saw how much my total cholesterol dropped.  Now I wonder why I resisted taking a statin for so long. I would have been much better off being on it for the last few years.

by SJAaries, Feb 12, 2009 01:25PM
To: anacyde
I have recently had a stent inserted into my left anterior descending artery and thought twice before starting statins, due to the liver and neurological damage statins can cause. Still not convinced they are the safest option. Have you had any side effects?

by heartfluttersflyawayplz, Feb 12, 2009 05:30PM
i take liptor (liptor) and tricor and its made all the differences in me wish i had started them sooner have had no side affects get my blood levels checked every 6 months and liver alls good .
Related discussions
Post Comment
To
Comment
Post Comment
Recent Activity
Exercise Tracker: 11/23/09
46 mins ago by RadioAstronomyObserver
lvfrogs is thankful for the many friends I have met on here!
Weblog from a cardiologist. Keeping...
6 hrs ago by newzor
Healing anxiety, stress and depress...
6 hrs ago by newzor
newzor is still alive!
newzor uploaded new photos
7 hrs ago
majella3 added the Weight Tracker
9 hrs ago
hartley78 added the Anxiety/Panic Tracker
11 hrs ago
RSS Expert Activity
Thanksgiving
1 hr ago by Thomas Dock, Vet. Technician
Snoring As Your Internal Smoke Alar...
Nov 22 by Steven Y Park, MD
Raw Pet Food Diets: Common Sense
Nov 21 by Arnold L Goldman, D.V.M.
Community Members