"Perhaps you should stay away from Pretzels! ;)"
Maybe I'm wearing off on some here!<G>
wilson-wilson
I had thought that a propensity for neurocardiogenic syncope COUPLED with a low heart rate - made for a bad combination; i.e. with a heart rate already so low it doesn't take much to lose conscousness. Whether one is truly "symptomatic" is not as clear cut as it sounds. One may seem excessively tired, cold. Maybe incoherent syntax could be a warning sign.
I just wonder why my doctors (and I got a second and third independent opinion) were unanimous in recommending the PM. I had one observed fainting episode, and an accident that in retrospect I attribute to an episode - though I could never be certain. In any case, not having a full time chauffeur, I figured I better go ahead and do everything to prevent a potentially dangerous incident!
Not a DOC.
Dear wen,
Perhaps you should stay away from Pretzels! ;)
You are asking about 2 different issues - pacemaker for low heart rate, and pacemaker for neurocardiogenic syncope (NCS). In regard to the first there is no "lower limit" which determines if someone needs a pacemaker as long as they are symptom free. If there are symptoms due to the low heart rate then pacing is recommended.
As far as NCS goes pacing helps some people but not everyone. In general we like to see multiple fainting episodes and not just one and a failure to respond to lifestyle changes and medications before we recommend pacing.