axg,
I cannot recommend medicines over this forum.
What I can tell you is that even people with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation have an increased risk for stroke and embolic complications from thier fibrillation. The fact youve had a TIA in the past, unless it is well documented that it was not associated with fibrillation is a very big risk factor for having a complication from fibrillation.
Coumadin tends to be markedly underused because physicians and patients tend to underestimate the benefits and overestimate the risks associated with continuous oral anticoagulation.
I would discuss your case with someone who treats fibrillation regularly to make this decision.
good luck
I'm not a doctor,and it will be good to read the comment, but when I had an ablation the EP did a pulmonary vein ablation and also for atrial flutter (a fast heart rate). The atrial flutter would occur during exercise and then it would turn into AFIB. Strangely it only occured when I was running outside in cold weather. If you have been a runner most of your life with a low heart rate, you might have developed paroxymal AFIB from the stretching of the pulmonary veins. That was the theory of my EP at Mayo. He says they see lots of AFIB among runners, hockey players and basketball players.
As to coumadin there are all sorts of theories. One cardiologist I went to said I should take it, another said an adult aspirin if I'm not getting AFIB all the time. I decided to go the aspirin route because at age 49 I was still too active.
I am now AFIB and atrial flutter free since ablation, but I still take one adult aspirin a day.
I think you are going to find numerous opinions on coumadin. I think it's going to be a personal call. Most lean toward coumadin.
I encourage you to go to an EP at a large medical facility. You might be a candidate for an ablation.
Do you think they would even do an EP study considering how seldom I get A-Fib? Thanks.
Erik
Just my opinion your a-fib doesn't warrant such an invasive procedure and you seem to being doing well on the meds. I don't know if you drink alcohol, but some wine , beer or mixed drink could have triggered your episode of a-fib, also high stress at the time or it might have occurred for no reason that can be identified.
On another note you seemed to a bit obssessed with rising your good choloestrol levels(no offence intended pal) I guess we are almost in the same boat regarding obsessing!!!
Be contented and reassured, your risk for a coronary heart disease seems to be quite low. One of the biggest markers regardless of choloestrol , high B/P ,inflammatory markers are a strong family history, most cardiologist will tell you this.
Of course there is always an odd ball that has the perfect family history , does all the right things and develop heart disease, then there is those that has a bad family hitory, does all the wrong things and never develop heart disease.
All we can do is live life to the fullest and deal with the hand we are dealt regardless of what it might be and never give up or give in to what ever befalls us until we have no absolute control over it anymore.
Take care.
I don't think they would based upon my experience.
At Mayo their philosophy is that you must fail two meds keeping you in rythmn. If I only had short runs of AFIB being on meds I would still be on meds. I would do very well on meds for awhile and then after 4 to 6 months I would "break through" and start having episodes that would last for hours (2 to 18) almost weekly.
I think that if you are only having short runs once in awhile you shouldn't even worry about it. If you are having other irregularities other than AFIB they might consider it depending upon how symptomatic you are. I also had atrial flutter and large numbers of PAC's. I haven't had atrial flutter since (at least to my knowledge), and I hardly have any PAC's anymore.
Your AFIB is definitely something to keep tabs on. I suspect (although I sure hope you don't) that as you get older (I'm 49) you will be more susceptible to longer AFIB bouts. So when you get to that point I would definitely have the EP study. It's great to know that there is now hope for AFIB sufferers.
Erik
I am seeing an EP and he had recommended Coumadin. I am hesitating because I had tried Toprol and Rythmol for a week each and quit because they aggravated my symptoms. I am going to try Inderal next to see if it can help me run (more than a mile).
SO I hesitate to take something that will inhbit my lifestyle if the risks of not doing so are small.
Finally my EP tells me that my wrist BP monitor that shows very slow heart rates (50-60) when I have my dizziness (and for about 15 mts afterward) can't be trusted and that my true rates are probably higher. How do I tell if I'm in Afib if I am not having dizziness? My pulse seems to be steady when I take it. Thanks again to all.
I do not know if I am ready for that procedure yet. I am a school principal and this year has been very stressful. However, I plan to retire at the end of this year so I am thinking, why zap the node and become dependent on pacemaker if stress relief of retirment will help the problem.
I am an active person and plan to become more active on retirement. Also - I am not on coumadin, just asprin but if I get the pacemaker I will have to be on coumadin. Is the risk of stroke just as great on the pacemaker as it is off.
Anyone in a similar situation?
When you experience Afib, what physical symptoms do you have? Have you ever checked your heart rate with a BP monitor during Afib to see what readings you get?
I started using a heart rate monitor to track conditioning during exercising and observed that it detected occasional short runs of A-F. I upgraded to a model where my heart rate is recorded every five seconds for up to 5.5 hours (my exercise routines - tennis, running, etc. - are completed before this time runs out. I download the traces to my computer for later review and comparison.
I think the doctors don't trust the pulse rates when you are in A-F because the rates are quite variable. Mine would start as high as 200+ and gradually decrease to less than 100 bpm, but the peaks between beats would be high (+/- 20 bpm or higher) where normally the peaks would be =/- 4 bpm. One the A-F converts, the variation returns to normal.
Again, if you haven't considered this, a HR monitor may be of use.
Good Luck!
I agree that the readings are not reliable because they change frequently (the signals have a lot of noise). However, the noisy signals are real, i.e. that's what your heart rate is doing. When I had the occasional run of A-F, the monitor detected it. I think most of us who have experienced this unpleasantness know when it is occurring, because I wear my monitor whenever I exercise, I have been able to capture these events and document them with recorded data. Having viewed the recorded tracings, I also know what the variations look like when I read pulse rate by looking at the display.
Again, I originally purchased my heart rate monitors to enhance my exercise routines. I have observed the effect of cardizem and other medicines (eg. demerol) on lowering of my maximum heart rate during exercise.
This may be more than you wanted to know, but Polar (I have 2) has worked for me.
However, I have had a few runs of Afib induced by cold drinks and it hasn't converted (even with vagal movements) resulting in a few visits (2 times in 4 years) to the emergency room.
Hence, I am not in Afib frequently. I have cardizem to slow the heart rate if an event occurs with the expectation that it will convert, and to date this works. I have experienced light headiness (even blurred vision) only once. This was several years ago and I had my monitor on, and my rate was irregular and near 180 bpm. This was one of the times when I went to the emergency room. I was also overweight and not exercising regularly. One of the significant changes that I observed using my heart rate monitor was that the rate of recovery (time from maximum rate to near resting rate) improved as my conditioning improved. The maximum rate at the same intensity of exercise also decreased.
Although my experience is with Polar, I expect that most of them will perform similarly.
I decided to get an ablation for four basic reasons:
1) Medications were not working. They would work for awhile and then fail. I was having a bout it seems every week or two for hours at a time.
2) AFIB made me tired. I could function, but I felt energy drain while in AFIB. I wasn't willing to live with that. Had I not felt the energy drain I may have decided differently
3) The EP from May looked at my history and felt very strongly that my problem was due to being a runner (particulary a track runner in high school and college). They see lots of AFIB in highly conditioned athletes due to what they call pulmonary vein stretching. Therefore they felt success would be very high.
4) I did not want to be on anti-coagulants. I wanted to live a fairly active life and coumadin if not regulated very well can be hazardous.
Much of this had to do with the aggressive nature of my cardiologist who felt that AFIB should not be tolerated and that staying in rythmn is a necessity rather than a luxury. I think there are some who feel differently.
Hope that helps. I would really encourage you to consider an ablation if your EP feels strongly it would help. I have felt so good since. I continue to run and remain active.
My AFIB would occur for hours not a few minutes. Therefore they were able to get a very good read on where it was originating and where to ablate.
I think medication is a more appropriate form of treatment if you are in AFIB for only a minute or so.
I have taken an 325 mg aspirin tablet everyday for 4 years. I
also take a multivitamin and magnesium tablet. My cardio
offered coumadin, but I declined (he wasn't emphatic about
this).
2. What is the natural variation that one can expect in bpm.
while exercising?
My (emphasis on My) nominal variation is +/- 2 to 4 bpm at
rest (eg. 60 avg, 58 to 62)or at peak (eg. 160 avg, 158 to
162) exercise. The variation during a run of A-F can be as
high as +/- 20 bpm (eg. 80 avg, 60 to 100 bpm).
Your nominal rates appear to be much lower than mine. When I have gotten a run of A-F, my rate goes high. When the rate returns to a low value (usually less than 60), it usually converts to normal ryhthm.
If you are familiar with the tennis rating system, I play at 4.0 to 4.5 levels, so some of the matches are quite intense. I also play in South Carolina and Miami summers. Maximum rates while exercising in intense heat is another story.
I have 5 years of data (4 to 5 episodes a year) and a 100% correlation between my experiencing A-F and the rates recorded by my HRM. I also have confirming data when I have gone to the emergency room (4 times) and the EKG has indicated A-F as read by the doctor after I "told" them that I was in A-F when admitted.
I have never been diagnosed with PAC's or PVC's so I don't know how these would present on a HRM. I do know what my baseline HR looks like and that it also correlates with "official" indications that my A-F has converted. My confidence in the readings from my HRM may be due to the fact that I don't have any other complicating rythyms.
I expect that your HRM will be very revealing to you.
Take care and good luck.
Personally I wouldn't tolerate AFIB every time I exercised. Also if you are getting lots of PAC's they are most likely triggers for your AFIB.
I think whenever AFIB cannot be controlled by meds (which it seems like you are sensitive to) and it is taking something out of your life that would affect your enjoyment of life (exercise), then you should go to an EP and consider an ablation.
I agree with your cardio about taking a more aggressive approach to that. In my earlier post I thought these episodes were rare, but they sound like they are exercise induced and occur most of the time. Is that correct?
The variation in my normal rate as measured by my HRM is also the same at low and high rates when I am exercising (+/- 2). I normally walk and run outside where my rates are noticeably noisy. However, when I exercise on a treadmill, my rates increase in nice plateaus when the intensity is increased. These may be academic observations for you with your recent experience.
Our feelings of dizziness during these events may be the result of the same effect (i.e. inefficient pumping by the heart) but the root cause appears to be different (high rate vs low rate).
I agree with dquenzer's comments and I hope you find the root cause and get well soon.
You will hear many of the horror stories when it comes to ablations because those will be posted most often. It's kind of like the news. Bad news is heard more than good. The greatest risk of an ablation is not that you will have a pacemaker, but more likely that of bleeding at the entry points.
When you get your insurance changed my suggestion is that you look at large medical facilities that have a long history of doing ablations. Now is not the time to let a rookie be your primary EP.
I happened to go to Mayo. I think I had one of the best EP's in the country. He was incredibly skilled.
By the way you will need to take coumadin for about 3 months after an ablation.
Recently, researchers from the Washington University of Medicine in St. Louis have devised a simple model to help doctors and patients decide whether anticoagulation therapy is warranted for people who have afib. The model - called the CHADS model - assigns a score from 0 to 6, based on the patient's age and other medical conditions. You get 2 points if you've had a prior stroke, 1 point if you have congestive heart failure, 1 point for high blood pressure, 1 point for diabetes, and one point if you are age 75 or older.
Those with scores of 0 don't require coumadin, an aspirin a day will do. Those with 2 or more points should definitely be on coumadin. One point is iffy. I have one point (high BP) but my cardiologist was concerned because I have also mitral valve regurgitation and an enlarged atria, so wants me to take it. You can read more about this at the following URL: http://heartdisease.about.com/library/weekly/aa080601a.htm . They discuss the odds of getting a stroke when you have afib and depending on your score and treatment(w/aspirin, w/coumadin, etc.). For example, with a score of two and taking nothing, you have a 4% chance of getting a stroke in one year's time (this translates to about a 50/50 chance over ten years - - scary huh?). The coumadin reduces that to about a third of those values (50-50 over 30 years). It's up to you to decide if you want to take the chance.
BTW. The duration and frequency of the afib doesn't effect your score. Basically, once you start having PAF, you're considered to have the same long term risk as someone who is in continuous afib.
Best wishes,
Tony
Sorry to say but I think you are wrong as well!
Your 10 year 0.277 number indicates that you are assuming a binomial distribution with an event probability of p=0.04, N=10 trials, and an exact oucome of K=1 stroke. Sites like http://www.ciphersbyritter.com/JAVASCRP/BINOMPOI.HTM#Poisson provide a calculator for plugging in numbers like that. But I don't really need it. Where you err is that you are ASSUMING ONE and ONLY ONE stroke during that time. You can theoretically have up to 10 successes (strokes) in 10 trials. The proper way to calculate having AT LEAST one stroke is to first calculate the probability of having NO strokes (i.e., 0.96 to the 10th power or 0.6648) and subtract that probability from one. The correct 10 year number is actually 0.335. The 20 and 30 year numbers are 0.55 and 0.706.
As you can see, as a physics major, I took probability and statistics in college too. LOL.
Best wishes,
Tony