Good morning. 59/female. 8 yrs "severe non exercised,cyclic angina pains". No DX from cardio's. Research at CC & B/W Sites described PrinzmetalAngina/C.
SpasmsCoronary artery spasm
Croup
Eyelid twitch
Facial tics
Hand or foot spasms
Urge incontinence
Vascular spasm. This info was still ignored. Responded to
NitroNitro td patch-a
Nitro-bid
Nitro-dur(someone RX this)Finally Cath'd in 2004.Mid LAD,95%,RCA75%
blockagePeripheral artery disease.Taxus and CypherCoated
stentsAbdomen - swollen
Brain herniation
Chronic persistent hepatitis
Coronary artery stent
Hyperemesis gravidarum
Lyme disease - chronic persistent
Stent. Distal LAD,
SeptalUltrasound, ventricular septal defect - heartbeat
Ventricular septal defect/Apex
blockagePeripheral artery disease could not be stented.NO MI seen and I was cured! Weeks later,severe angina.Same MO. New Cath,2 more stents in RCA and still severe Angina.Had MRI.Severe hypokinesia/akinesia in distal half of septum and apex.Viability/scar imaging revealed transmural/near transmural scar in that area also.I had a heart attack not seen on 2 Cath's.
Doctor, how can this be? Isn't a Cath the gold standard? 4 months later,had Acute Event. Different M.O. No Angina. Had irregular HR,SOB,Sweating,weakness. ER noted A-FIB at190HR.Normal Enzymes.Coverted to NSR.Admitted overnight.Enzymes repeated. Troponin 4.5,(peak)CK-MB 23.8. Fellow said NSTEMI. New Cath doc said NO MI,just an event. Stented 50% blockagein LAD,not stented by first doc and noted on report "Excellent Angiograph". BUT,now seen on 2D Echo's,"Dynamic LVOT Obstruction due to SAM" with 32mmHG gradient. No answers. Do not have CHF or HCOM. E fraction better than 60%.Cardio has never seen this. I found articles on Dynamic LVOT Obstruction in Acute Anterior MI settings as I feel I did have another MI.(Troponin level). 8 yrs of severe angina NOW gone.(-: Most likely no viable tissue left in distal half of septum. Doctor, Am I now at risk for a fatal complication? Your thoughts, please? Thanks for helping me.
PLAVIX: I will post what I know and don't know. When I had the drug eluding stents, I was told I had to be on them for one year. It has been almost 2 years for 2 stents, 18 months for 2 other stents and now one year for the last stent. I was nearing the end of this Plavix when I read in USA today and on the internet that doctors at a Heart Convention in March, 2006, feel that patients on the drug eluting stents may need to be on Plavix forever as they are seeing some patients with these drug eluting stents get off Plavix after one year and sufferingt a heart attack and or sudden death. Scary, to say the least. When I reads this News, I was furious. Here I could of had the bare metal stents but felt the drug eluted stents would protect me forever. My neighbor, my cousin, my uncle have bare metal stents and are doing great and off Plavix now for 3 years and no restenoses or MI. On another forum, a doctor was saying that cardiologists must discuss these findings with patients and give them the option of bare metal vs. drug coated as now it seems people may have to be on Plavix for a lifetime to keep the drug coated stents open and many people do not have the $$$$ to buy Plavix month after month and year after year. I wish I had the bare metal stents. I would be off Plavix by now and not worry whether I will bleed soemtime in this course and not worry if I need a surgical procedure and have to be off Plavix for 5-7 days which could be disasterous. I also heard that there is suppose to be a new stent coming out in the future which is disposable? degradeable? I hope I have those words correct. But, we have coated stents now and I guess we are stuck with them and the Plavix.
MRI's...This test has no radiationn involved. It is a very good test and will show muscle damage and function and will view arteries for blcokages and all the heart valves. It also shows the Ejection fraction.
MRI and stents. The Cardiac MRI radiolgist said people can have an MRI right after stenting but I made sure I waited 2 weeks. Some people wait 4 weeks. When I had my MRI, there were only about 12 in the country but now more centers are getting these highly specialized machines. I hope to get another one soon to check the latest event. We have three Cardiac MRI places now in our city.
Mike, Heart Cath is not without risk. One doctor messed up one of my arteries. He never told me but I found out later. I do not want anymore. I will ask for another MRI. They mentioned the CT 64 slice scan but this is a lot of radiation. I head a doc say they will be coming out with a 94? slice CT scan that shows a lot more but this also will be more radiation. When you are young, they try to avoid a lot of radiation as this is all cumulative and both of you men, are soo young. You have a lot of living yet to do. Now, if one is OLD and gray, LOL, I would risk the radiation and pray they do not nik another artery. Make sure your cath doctor can SEE and does not drink water first, LOL, and you go to a good heart center.
Keep on rambling. This is what gets us through the days with HD. Talking is good.
God Bless You all.
You mentioned a one sided approach (patient). I have seen this but seems the patient may know more than a particular physician on a particular problem. No pun intended but some doctors are bombarded in hospital duties, teaching a class, charting,working in a lab and seeing patients one day a week. I feel they do not have enough personal "patient" contact and if they have a case that is rare, they do not have the time to research a particular problem so it gets thrown into the "general pile". Then there is the doctor that has small children at home that keeps him up all night and he/she cannot function during the day. I have seen it all. The bottom line is that every patient has to do their homework and if a loved one needs help also, we need to step in. There is a saying, "an educated patient makes for a better patient".
Three days ago, my daughter was diagnosed with a heart condition. She has not felt well for some time but faithfully went to her long time doctor who dismissed her complaints as "getting older" and her "thyroid". I called her doctor and asked if he would order certain tests for her, mentioning my own health problems. This never happened.
Enter new female internal med doctor. She wasted no time. Tests proved positive and daughter has an appointment with a leading cardiolgist soon. My daughter is frightened now and wished she had been more assertive with her former doctor or walked away sooner. She said she did not want to hurt his feelings!~!