I have had nsvt over a period of almost three years. I have also had many many test, which include, tilt table, several echos, treadmill, mri, single average
ecgEcg
Electrocardiogram (ecg)
Exercise stress test
Post myocardial infarction ecg wave tracings, which all have been
normalNormal saline flush. I have also wore king of hearts many many times, 24 hour monitor, and now I have a loop recorder implanted. In January of this year I had the worst run of nsvt 26 beats with h/r of 187. I had an ep study, the doc in Utah said 90% chance of me being fixed! HA! They did the ep study it took over three hours, they could not induce my vt! However they did with very aggressive stimulation induce vfib! My question is, If they would have induced vt then it could be life threating or even not life threating but be fixed, They tell me since they could not induce the vt that it means its
benignBenign ear cyst or tumor
Benign positional vertigo, my chances of scd are the same as if I didn have it. But can the vt still be life threating even if its not induable? My ef is 70% They say I have a
normalNormal saline flush healtly heart and strong. Its just making me crazy that they say its not life threating now but they induce vfib in me. The h/r of 187 has me a bit concerned as well. Im not on any meds I had taken three low doses of torprol xl and thats when I had the 26 beat run. Each time I have nsvt its when sitting and relaxing so I think slower h/r does it for me. The meds they used in the ep study are
IsuprelIsuprel hcl
Isuprel mistometer, and
EsmololEsmolol
Esmolol hydrochloride with very aggressive stimulation. Do you think if I had another ep study they might get lucky and induce vt or do you think it would be a waste of money and time. I would be willing to do it again.Im just really confussed. Thank you Wmac
Neener
wmac