Member Comments are provided by individuals and reflect their personal opinions only. Under NO circumstances should you act on any advice or opinion posted in this forum. ALWAYS check with your personal physician before taking any action regarding your health! MedHelp International and our partners, sponsors and affiliates have no obligation to monitor any comments posted on this site, or the content and/or accuracy of such exchanges. MedHelp International does not endorse the views of any user.
Heart Disease (Expert Forum)
Efficacy of Sotalol in Preventing Arrythmia
This forum is for questions and support regarding heart issues such as: Angina, Angioplasty, Arrhythmia, Bypass Surgery, Cardiomyopathy, Coronary Artery Disease, Defibrillator, Heart Attack, Heart Disease, High Blood Pressure, Mitral Valve Prolapse, Pacemaker, PAD, Stenosis, Stress Tests.
Efficacy of Sotalol in Preventing Arrythmia
by ICD_2003, Jul 19, 2006 12:00AM
28 year old male - ICD implanted in 2003 due to suspected ARVC based on family history. This was a prophylactic treatment as I did not have any documented episodes of VT, etc prior to implant.
Have only had one shock since then (going on almost four years) - shcok was for fast VT (approx 260 bpm).
My question relates to medications. After the shock (January 2006) doc rx'ed atenolol (25 mg once a day). On average, this dropped my heart rate into the 50's and I had no complaints due to the low heart rate.
However, due to an increase in PVCs recently, my cardiologist suggested we try sotalol (was at my request as PVCs were bothersome). I have been taking 80 mg twice a day for approximately 3 months now.
I have two questions regarding the sotalol:
(1) Originally, like the atenolol, the sotalol reduced my heart rate into the 50's. However, the past month or so my heart rate is back up into the 70's?? Can the beta blocking effects of sotalol wane over time? Also, does this mean the drug is no longer working to reduce probability of arrythmia (i.e. is the drug still acting to prolong refractory period?)
(2) Also, how effective is sotalol at decreasing the incidence of ventricular arrtyhtmias (i.e. are there any studies, etc?) I ask becasue I am considering going back to atenolol!
Regards
ICD_2003
Have only had one shock since then (going on almost four years) - shcok was for fast VT (approx 260 bpm).
My question relates to medications. After the shock (January 2006) doc rx'ed atenolol (25 mg once a day). On average, this dropped my heart rate into the 50's and I had no complaints due to the low heart rate.
However, due to an increase in PVCs recently, my cardiologist suggested we try sotalol (was at my request as PVCs were bothersome). I have been taking 80 mg twice a day for approximately 3 months now.
I have two questions regarding the sotalol:
(1) Originally, like the atenolol, the sotalol reduced my heart rate into the 50's. However, the past month or so my heart rate is back up into the 70's?? Can the beta blocking effects of sotalol wane over time? Also, does this mean the drug is no longer working to reduce probability of arrythmia (i.e. is the drug still acting to prolong refractory period?)
(2) Also, how effective is sotalol at decreasing the incidence of ventricular arrtyhtmias (i.e. are there any studies, etc?) I ask becasue I am considering going back to atenolol!
Regards
ICD_2003
Doctor's Answer
by CCF-M.D.-MJM, Jul 19, 2006 12:00AM
Hello,
(1) Can the beta blocking effects of sotalol wane over time?
Your body can adapt to the dose and you may require more. If you aren't having a lot of pvcs or vt, I would not increase it or change dose because your basal rate increased.
Does this mean the drug is no longer working to reduce probability of arrythmia (i.e. is the drug still acting to prolong refractory period?)
The best marker for this is the arrhythmia itself. If you aren't having VT, I wouldn't increase.
(2) Also, how effective is sotalol at decreasing the incidence of ventricular arrtyhtmias (i.e. are there any studies, etc?) I ask becasue I am considering going back to atenolol!
If you have only had one episode of VT, it is reasonable to be on atenolol. I would use sotalol for someone that has frequent VT, not necessarily only one episode. If you develop frequent VT, sotalol is a reasonable choice and possibly even at higher doses.
I hope this helps. Thanks for posting.
(1) Can the beta blocking effects of sotalol wane over time?
Your body can adapt to the dose and you may require more. If you aren't having a lot of pvcs or vt, I would not increase it or change dose because your basal rate increased.
Does this mean the drug is no longer working to reduce probability of arrythmia (i.e. is the drug still acting to prolong refractory period?)
The best marker for this is the arrhythmia itself. If you aren't having VT, I wouldn't increase.
(2) Also, how effective is sotalol at decreasing the incidence of ventricular arrtyhtmias (i.e. are there any studies, etc?) I ask becasue I am considering going back to atenolol!
If you have only had one episode of VT, it is reasonable to be on atenolol. I would use sotalol for someone that has frequent VT, not necessarily only one episode. If you develop frequent VT, sotalol is a reasonable choice and possibly even at higher doses.
I hope this helps. Thanks for posting.
wmac
But it is also good to reduce bothering PVCs.
Why do you want to go back to Atenol? Your bpm and bp seem just ok. You want them lower? You can go higher with dosage, you can arrive also to 320 mg per day of Sotalol. What is your problem with Sotalol?
wmac