Member Comments are provided by individuals and reflect their personal opinions only. Under NO circumstances should you act on any advice or opinion posted in this forum.  ALWAYS check with your personal physician before taking any action regarding your health! MedHelp International and our partners, sponsors and affiliates have no obligation to monitor any comments posted on this site, or the content and/or accuracy of such exchanges. MedHelp International does not endorse the views of any user.
Heart Disease  (Expert Forum)
 | 
GXT
This forum is for questions and support regarding heart issues such as: Angina, Angioplasty, Arrhythmia, Bypass Surgery, Cardiomyopathy, Coronary Artery Disease, Defibrillator, Heart Attack, Heart Disease, High Blood Pressure, Mitral Valve Prolapse, Pacemaker, PAD, Stenosis, Stress Tests.

GXT

by long, Jul 05, 2003 12:00AM
Hi I am 35 year old male and on my graded sress test says the following "RESTING ECG:NSR,NONSPECIFIC ST-T WAVE CHANGES,WNL." On stress part of the report says the following "1.THE TEST WAS TERMINATED DUE TO GENERAL FATIGUE.2.NO STs.3.RARE ABERRANCY C ACTIVITY.4.NORMAL BP RESPONSE.5.GOOD WORK CAPACITY. IMPRESSION:NORMAL GXT."   1.Are "NONSPECIFIC ST-T WAVE CHANGES" signs of heart injury,like heart attack?If not what does it mean?2.Are causes of "RARE ABBERANCY C ACTIVITY" heart injuries,like old mild heart attacks?There are Left Ventricular EDV(ml) and ESV(ml),but there are no results for these parameters.3.How are these parameters determined and what are normal limits at CCF?Thanks

by CCF-M.D.-RCJ, Jul 05, 2003 12:00AM
Long,

Thanks for the post.

It appears that you are among the "worried well."  The last portion of your stress tess is WNL -- Within Normal Limits.  Congratulations!  If we all had the same EKGs, then we would all also have the same body shape, facial features, exercise capacity, height, etc.  Only clones would have the same ECG, and even then they would differ due to body position, lead placement, emotional state, etc.  Since we are not all the same, doctors place qualifiers on the EKG reports, like "nonspecific ST-T wave changes", so that we can denote the fact that the ECG is not textbook normal, but is still just fine.

Rare abberancy is likewise not a cause for concern.  It simply means that a rare beat conducted from the upper to the lower part of the heart in a slightly different manner than usual.  Abberancy does not imply heart attack.

LVEDD and LVESV are determined by echo, thus there are no values for these since you did not have an echo.

Hope that helps.  Enjoy your weekend.




Continue discussion
RSS Expert Activity
EVIDENCE-BASED APPROACH TO NEUTER S...
14 hrs ago by Arnold L Goldman, D.V.M.
HOW DO/SHOULD DOCTORS THINK ABOUT T...
14 hrs ago by Arnold L Goldman, D.V.M.
Simple tool to Assess your Risk for...
Dec 14 by Lee Kirksey, MD