Member Comments are provided by individuals and reflect their personal opinions only. Under NO circumstances should you act on any advice or opinion posted in this forum. ALWAYS check with your personal physician before taking any action regarding your health! MedHelp International and our partners, sponsors and affiliates have no obligation to monitor any comments posted on this site, or the content and/or accuracy of such exchanges. MedHelp International does not endorse the views of any user.
Hi, I have been searching the post here on the forums, as well as the internet, and can not get a straight answer, so thought I would try posting again to see if I get a response. I have tryed talking to doctors, but everyone has a different opinion.
I have had two dr.s tell me it indicates yes indeed I did have a MI, another one said it was inconclusive, he thought it was normalNormal saline flush. ( But he did not get to see the pictures of my heart, only the paper report.) Now I am set up for a CardiacCardiac catheterization Cardiac tamponade Left heart ventricular angiography Catherization on June 2'nd to find out what is going on for sure.
Everything I have read talks about reverse Perfusion in terms I do not understand. One item I found on the net last night calls it; Reverse Redistribution in Resting Thallium imaging. NObody seems to call it exaclty the same term, or if they do, they do not describe what the significence of what this means. Nothing is in laymans terms.
To put it as easily as I can, the way the dr. described it to me was like this. In the test, on resting imaging, my heart was lit up like a Christmal tree, ( Reverse Perfusion Defect ) and this is the way it should have been after Exercise, not before exercise, so this indicated there was a problem and that my Mocardium, the apex was one of the areas, that did not absorb, or take up this dye correctly when exercising, and this is what indicated there had been some recent damage.
Here is one statement; Reverse redistribution appears t occur most frequently following thrombolysis post
myocardial infarction. Then there is a statement showing the percentage of percentages of segments at specific time periods. At 1-2 month post myocardial infarction reverse redistribution was recorded at 48%. ( I fit the 1 month post MI timeframe.)
Is there anyone else out there who also had this same Reverse Perfusion defect happen to them. ( Reverse resting image compared to stress image takeup of dye. ??) If so, I would love to hear from you and hear your expereince. This is driving me crazy, I know someone must have had the same thing happen to them. Help please if you can.
Thank you in advance. fluffypurrcat