Member Comments are provided by individuals and reflect their personal opinions only. Under NO circumstances should you act on any advice or opinion posted in this forum.  ALWAYS check with your personal physician before taking any action regarding your health! MedHelp International and our partners, sponsors and affiliates have no obligation to monitor any comments posted on this site, or the content and/or accuracy of such exchanges. MedHelp International does not endorse the views of any user.
 | 

Heart Bypass good for 3 months?

by Carol223, Feb 06, 2008 07:50AM
In Oct.2007 my 66 yr old, non smoking husband had 5 bypasses and an aortic valve replacement.  Approx. 2 1/2 after surgery his cardiologist had him undergo a series of tests on his heart.  At about the same time he began to have chest pain when walking which has become more servere.  He also has pain when he becomes nervous or anxious which he never had before the surgery.  On our follow up visit his Dr told him the tests shows a portion of his heart where there are 3 bypasses is not getting enough blood.  Although we realized his recovery was going backwards we were shocked.  Teh doctor feels plague is the cause of the problem.  My husband resisted his suggestion of doing a cath, so he was given a prescription for Tricor 145mg.  The doctor drew a diagram of the procedure that was used and in the area where there is apparently blockage a T was used to do 2 bypasses.  The cardiologist seemed concerned that a stent may be difficult or impossible to place there.  My questions are: 1: How can blockage occur so soon after surgery and should we expect more of the same in the near future? 2:  Do we have unrealistic hopes from the Tricor? 3:  Why would a technique (a T) be used which would make repair difficult or impossible?
Member Comments (3)

by Flycaster305, Feb 06, 2008 10:16AM
To: Carol223
I can certainly understand your husband's reluctance to have a cath procedure given the amount of surgery and hospital time he has had.  However, a cath will in all probability answer the questions that are foremost in your minds, and hopefully point to a solution.  I've had at least ten of the heart cath procedures, and they are minimally invasive, just an inconvenience.  If I were in your husband's shoes, I'd be begging for the cath procedure asap.  I don't function very well when facing a problem when I don't have any information to use to solve the problem.  I wish you both well.  Keep us informed.

by kenkeith, Feb 06, 2008 05:50PM
To: Carol
An area of blockage that is at a bifurgated location is difficult to stent  as a dilation of branch occludes (partially) the other.  I have complete blockage of the LAD and 72% of the circumflex vessel.  Graphically, it looks more like a "Y" on its side. The LAD has developed collateral vessels and a natural bypass.  Th circumflex is untreated.  Medication has been the protocol for about 4 years, and I have no problems.

Frankly, I don't understand the "T" techique, and you ask a  good question, "why?"    A blockage should not or it is not expected to occlude so quickly, if at all.  But the grafted vessel is harvested from an area that may have had some occlusion.  Unfortunately, the vessel is not clean as a whistle, and there is a limited source of choice.  Is a cath exploratory to determine if a stent can be implanted? What test determined the bypass problem?

Tricor is medication to lower cholesterol.  That wouldn't correct the current problem, but is meant more to prevent further blockage.  

Sorry for yiour husband's problem after all the surgery, etc.  Nor a very good commentary for a bypass!

by Carol223, Feb 18, 2008 02:47AM
To: kenkeith
Thank you for your reply. A stress test determined there was a problem.  An angiogram on 2/13 revealed 4 of 5 bypasses had shut down.  He was immediately hospitalized to keep him safe for surgery scheduled on 2/19 as his heart is now functioning on only one major artery.  Needless to say I am most anxious and wish we had more answers.  When I ask why this happened it is difficult to get a direct answer.  They are doing a great of blood tests to determine if there is a condition there that could be problem. The technique used, 2 connectors for 5 bypasses doesn't seem to be a technique that this cardiologist is impressed with. When I ask how we know this won't happen again he says a difficult technique will be used.   I feel I have to read between the lines to get the meaning of some of what he says.  I realize one professional is careful about criticism of another.  In a few hrs I will be meeting with the surgeon and I hope so very much he will say something to help lessen the anxiety.  And, of course, maybe some straight answers on just went wrong.  They have told me he has a good prognosis, but the fear doesn't leave.  Of course, it is difficult to think of him going through this again in less than 4 months time.  

Thank you again for taking the time to reply.  
Related discussions
Post Comment
To
Comment
Post Comment
Recent Activity
Me967 { :~/ -::::: Happy Thanksgiving everyone. So sorry I haven'...
April2 Have a blessed and happy Thanksgiving everyone!
Cherie762 thinking of Pecan Pie and Pumpkin Pie and Coconut Creame...
LindaTX enlightened
Cherie762 commented on My Army Son Robbie is...
5 hrs ago
Cherie762 commented on photo
5 hrs ago
Cherie762 commented on Is this a simple cyst...
5 hrs ago
Cherie762 commented on A Day In The Life.
6 hrs ago
RSS Expert Activity
What You Don't Know About Breathing...
Nov 24 by Steven Y Park, MD
Thanksgiving
Nov 23 by Thomas Dock, Vet. Technician
Snoring As Your Internal Smoke Alar...
Nov 22 by Steven Y Park, MD
Community Members