The doctor who did the procedure will have written a report and it is on file at the hospital where the cath was performed. This report is available to you, and I suggest you obtain a copy.
Another option why the 85% blockage didn't receive a stent might be that the vessel was very twisted or small or both.
If your EF in 2decho is greater than 40% and you do not have any symtoms after attack you may be in a position to carry on with medicine. I had two heart attacks and my angiograph shows blockeges more than yours. I am carrying on with medicines after second attack for more than six months. I do not have any symtoms and no pain too. You may refer to my postings.
Ken: In retrospect, I experienced (based on my description to all the doctors) an angina attack while I was trying to catch a flight from Honolulu to the mainland about 3 weeks ago.. I was under a lot of stress, running/walking about a 1/4 mile with about 50 lbs. of carry ons( my wife's) and with my plantar fasciitis boot on my left foot. I suffered the chest pains immediately after I settled down in my seat. It was a type of pain I never experienced before or after; it lasted about 3 minutes. The correlation I can draw from that experience is that when the ultrasound showed there was blockage on at least one artery, the doctor asked if I had chest pains on my way to the clinic that morning; question was asked as I was on a rest position on my left side. Thanks again for your response; nice to hear from someone who has experience in this area. Take care!
MrBert, there should always be a concern for any abnormal condition. Trying medication and watching does not sound unreasonable. I have a totally occluded left ventricle (collateral bypass) and a 70% occluded vessel and have been treated and watched for about 7 years. I take medication, and don't have any symptoms. I feel well, and no side effects from medication, and it appears there has been no progression.
If you don't have any symptoms such as chest pain (angina), it would indicate your heart cells are receiving sufficient oxygenated blood. Usually, occlusions less than 70% should not be stented according to the AAC/AHA guidelines, but apparently that was done? Did you have chest pains? Do you now have chest pains? That should be a consideration before any intervention and whether or not medication can be beneficial.
Hope this helps,
Ken
Thank you for your response. However, are my concerns valid or not?
You RCA is occluded to the extent there may be a deficit of good blood supply to the location normally supplied by the RCA. There could be a couple of reasons the doctor does not prefer to stent. The RCA may have developed collateral vessels that have formed a natural bypass. Also the blockage maybe at the distal end and not very significant in terms of needing a good supply of blood.
Another consideration may be that your vessel system's configuration is left-side dominate as opposed to right dominate. Usually, if I remember correctly the right-side dominate the RCA wraps around and under the heart to some blood circulation to the left side. Left-side dominate more extensive blood flow to the area and RCA isn't involved. And there may be a different configuation or a combination of the two.