Hi DHL64,
This is an area of evolution in cardiology and different institutions approach this problem differently.
Whether the timing is now or the future (perhaps not too distant future), I think you are headed for a mitral valve repair or possibly replacement. They will probably try a repair first, if it is not feasable, they will replace the valve.
I hope this helps.
It also states there is at least mild myxomatous degeneration of both mitral leaflets with bileaflet prolapse of a moderate degeree more so involving the posterior leaflet.
But the surgery has made me feel alot better than previously. I started getting symptoms about a year after my echo showed moderate to severe regurgitation. Then it went downhill real fast - symptoms got so bad. Before my surgery I couldn't walk, talk and breath at the same time. If you need surgery - I wish you the best - get to a good hospital that does a big volume of valve surgeries. I don't have to tell you CCF is a fantastic center. If your lucky to get in and you can get in - then you know your getting the best care in the country.
Ask lots of good questions when you see your cardiologist. Write your questions down before you go and bring someone with you if you can. But check out the valvereplacement board. Lots of good basic info out there.
Best Wishes
Marilyn
How fast did you go downhill? Is there a reason your regurgitation got worse so fast? Ellen
I can't say there is a reason why I was not having severe symptoms a year or so before my surgery. But I know my left ventricle wasn't as enlarged a year prior to my surgery. I don't think there was anything I could have done to delay the surgery - if that's what you mean. I was told if you wait too long and your left ventricle enlargement is severe - you may not benefit as much from the surgery. You don't want to wait to long and you don't want to go to surgery to soon.
I don't know that symptoms necessarily is the 100% factor in when they do the surgery. I think some people have no symptoms and yet they need the surgery. But I could be wrong. I just know I needed it badly by the time I got in there.
Why I went downhill so fast I don't know - but I heard it can happen. I did have to have echocardiograms every 6 mos per my cardiologist recommendations. They kept a good eye on me.. Once your left ventricle enlargement gets to a certain 'number' and your EF goes down to a certain percentage then I guess your within surgery guidelines. But alot of variables also are important - like symptoms and overall heart condition.. I want to let you know I'm not a doctor. The doctors make the decision to do surgery or not. They don't like to go in unless its really necessary. Doing various tests will help to see if it is.
www.valvereplacement.com was helpful before and after my surgery. It gave me a general idea of what open heart surgery was like. They didn't scare me to death either.
Good Luck Ellen and keep us posted.
Marilyn
After reading all these posts about valves I am quite confused. I had my appt at CCF this week for a second opinion. I was a rhuematic fever "kid" in the 1950s. I have started having heart problems and found out my mitral leaflets are thickend. Both my primary Dr. and the CCF Dr seem to be blowing this off. I also have mild to moderate coronary artery disease and 2+ tricuspid regurg, borderline left atrial enlargement. All I want are my questions answered, Why am I having chest pain and fatique, can't even mild valve problems cause symptoms? The Dr at CCF didn't even listen to my heart, didn't look at the studies I took along and just told me I am at high risk for a heart attack, and must control my blood pressure. All I want to know is, do I have rhuematic heart disease and are the valves going to get worse?
I am a 57 year old female non smoker 5'1" 128 pounds.
Any encouragement would help. Thanks
I think the doctor can tell if you have rheumataic heart disease by looking at an echo. If you are not comfortable with the first cardiac assessment, maybe a second opinion will help. Take a list of your questions with you. Sometimes, I think, people who are so specialized in their fields forget that we, patients, need more explanation and reassurance. There are tons of great doctors who would be happy to discuss your situaiton with you until you understand. Are you going for follow-ups? Did the doctor prescribe blood pressure lowering medicine?
connie
SP
My guess as to why they aren't doing anything is that they are taking a wait and see approach. This is because they might think that the valve and coronary disease is mild enough, at this point in time, that more harm than good would come from an intervention. That doesn't mean the situation will not change, but as for a time guideline, I can't really help you. my guess is that they willl check up on you with serial tests to see how things are going. Hope this helps a bit.
Have a nice day everyone!