I didn't even know a nuclear perfusion scan was used to establish ejection fractions of the Ventricles, but you learn something every day. I thought this looked at the myocardium and established oxygenation of the tissue.
The Ultrasound is used most commonly because it's the cheapest. It is usually calculated over 10 cycles but is still estimated to some extent.
The gold standard for measuring Ejection fractions is ventriculography. This involves injecting contrast dye directly into the ventricles.
I tend to agree. I thought the perfusion scan simply measured the blood flow to the myocardium under stress and at rest, then compared the two for the results. I had both the perfusion scan and echo on 29 September. My cardiologist referenced the echo for ejection fraction, but when I presented both results to the company doctor to approve me to return to work he said the perfusion scan was more accurate. I really don't think he knows what he's talking about. And the values between the two tests were quite different. According the to perfusion scan EF was 41%, but the echo was 50%. LOL...I'll take the echo results if you don't mind :).
I had a echo back in July 2009 shortly before I had a ton of other testing including a cath that showed quite a difference in my pressures and EF from echo, MRI and cath.
My ep told me then there was such a difference possibly due to tech and reader error...so I started doing research and found that there's a +/- 10% for echo's and sometimes more depending on the tech & reader's expertise some reports show up to +/- 15% errors which can mean alot.
No debate intended here and some interesting info. Thanks. I was assuming that my cardiologist would be the person to ultimately interpret the echo and I will ask about that. I was told that he would most definately be interpreting the results of the myocardial scan since he is certified in nuclear medicine.
Copyright 1994-2016 MedHelp International. All rights reserved.
MedHelp is a division of Aptus Health.
This site complies with the HONcode standard for trustworthy health information.
The Content on this Site is presented in a summary fashion, and is intended to be used for educational and entertainment purposes only. It is not intended to be and should not be interpreted as medical advice or a diagnosis of any health or fitness problem, condition or disease; or a recommendation for a specific test, doctor, care provider, procedure, treatment plan, product, or course of action. Med Help International, Inc. is not a medical or healthcare provider and your use of this Site does not create a doctor / patient relationship. We disclaim all responsibility for the professional qualifications and licensing of, and services provided by, any physician or other health providers posting on or otherwise referred to on this Site and/or any Third Party Site. Never disregard the medical advice of your physician or health professional, or delay in seeking such advice, because of something you read on this Site. We offer this Site AS IS and without any warranties. By using this Site you agree to the following Terms and Conditions. If you think you may have a medical emergency, call your physician or 911 immediately.