My partner is scheduled to have a
doubleDouble-tussin dm valve replacement on the 15th of March 2000. Alex was diagnosed with having
mitralMitral regurgitation - chronic
Mitral stenosis
Mitral valve prolapse stenosisAortic stenosis
Blocked tear duct
Carotid stenosis, x-ray of the left artery
Carotid stenosis, x-ray of the right artery
Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy
Mitral stenosis
Pulmonary valve stenosis
Pyloric stenosis
Renal artery stenosis
Spinal stenosis and
aorticAbdominal aortic aneurysm
Aortic aneurysm
Aortic angiography
Aortic arch syndrome
Aortic dissection
Aortic insufficiency
Aortic rupture, chest x-ray
Aortic stenosis
Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy
Thoracic aortic aneurysm incompetence in 1992 (8 years ago). He has been managing his health condition with medication for the past three years. However, a recent visit to his cardiologist (Prof. P. Manga)confirmed that his heart had enlargened significantly, necessitating valve replacement asap. We've met with the surgeon, Dr Martin Sussman (Milpark Clinic, Johannesburg, South
Africa), and he has recommended a mechanical valve for the
mitralMitral regurgitation - chronic
Mitral stenosis
Mitral valve prolapse valve and a bioprosthetic (pig)valve in the
aorticAbdominal aortic aneurysm
Aortic aneurysm
Aortic angiography
Aortic arch syndrome
Aortic dissection
Aortic insufficiency
Aortic rupture, chest x-ray
Aortic stenosis
Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy
Thoracic aortic aneurysm position. We are concerned about his valve choices as Alex is only 30 years old, and we understand that the prosthetic valve will require replacement in about 5-10 years time, which we would like to avoid if possible. We do understand that Alex will have to be on Waffarin for the rest of his life, but he has been taking this for the past 3 years with no associated problems. Furthermore, this medication will be necessary as he is to have a mechanical valve in the mitral position.
Please answer/comment on the following:
1. The use of two mechanical valves instead of the proposed machanical + bioprosthetic valves.
2. The use of St Judes bileaflet valves for both valve replacements.
3.We are very encouraged by the work done by the Cleveland doctors on minimal invasive surgery and would prefer this method to the standard surgery. But is it advisable in the case of double valve replacement? NB! repair of the mitral seems remote.
4. If he opts for two mechanical valves would the dosages of Waffarin be significantly increased?
Thank you. Looking forward to your response.
Vanessa
Glad to hear that your mom did so well!
I am scheduled for an AVR and possible Mitral repair or replace
on April 11-14? under Dr. Cosgrove. I noticed an earlier post of yours that you know his work quite well.
Of all the options and procedures what concerns me most is 1) On-pump time and 2) anesthesia.
You may or may not be able to answer me but which surgeon at CCF is the quickest and best for an AVR using the Baxter C-E Pericardial valve and would my time on-pump be more or less under a Minimally Invasive approach?
Dr. Cosgrove is one of the world's expert on valvular repair and will provide you with the absolute best ( shortest) pump time as is possible as well as the best in anesthesia. You are in very good hands!
Thanks for response. Originally Scheduled for 3/12/00 and now he's changed it to 4/10/00.
Looking forward to getting to the 'other side' of surgery.
Http://www.csmc.edu/cvs/md/valve/antissvl.htm
or .....valve/whatsnew.htm
Thanks
I have questions.
I go back for another ecg in June. I am concerned because I have read that many people have the AVR (no, I don't want to rush it) when they are at 1.0 cm. I also read that AS holds steady, then tends to go south fast. As the doctor hadn't picked up the murmur six months before that, I am concerned with the possible rate of progression. I am not sure what the criteria are for making the decision to go ahead. Does 0.8 seem a late starting point for a 47-year-old?
I don't want to suddenly be told I need an AVR and not be ready with a valve decision and a plan. I don't want to have it done in a local hospital by a local cardiologist. No offence to them, but I want the best odds I can get - such as CCHC. I don't know how to go about setting up such a thing when I don't know when it may happen and don't have any info to forward from a cardiologist. Is there someone at CCF who can help me be prepared when it does happen?
Who can I go to to help me decide what kind of valve might be best for me? I lean toward a homograft, but I'm sure there would be a waiting time due to a small supply. Is there a "list" that you need to be on?
Is it worth a second operation (porcine valve) to hold out for the bioengineered grow-your-owns that are being researched now? And does the type of valve I get determine what I will be able to get later if I need a future operation?
I am one of the many on this site who have gone the same route you are facing and if nothing else can offer some "I understand what you are feeling " comments but also offer a little info and thoughts from one who has been there.
I discovered I had the congenital bicuspid aortic valve when I was 36...not bad then and was told it may never get so bad I would have to have anything done...let them know if I got bad shortness of breath etc. Well, it happens slow, and in the meantime you know you get older. I didn't really think about it until it really dumped me last July. Family doctor thought it was my asthma and tried a couple of things for that. Went into congestive heart failure. Finally insisted I see a cardiologist. He got that bout of chf under control and found my aorta working at about 25% or less. SURGERY. I chose the Cleveland Clinic for just the same reasons you did, plus my cardiologist was all for it. I am 56 now and am basically pretty fit other than the heart deal.
I dug into all the knowledge I could find on the situation and remedies and choices. I always knew that I did not want a mechanical -- coumadin is rat poison -- my life style, I eat veggies, have wine, and farm and ride a motorcycle. I didn't think I would be willing to make the lifestyle changes a mechanical would require , plus I knew people often had to have resurgeries even with mechanical valves. I opted for a homograft. I too was worried about the availability, had no problems. They are cleansed and cyrogenically (?) stored at the facilities that have them. The CC is a fantastic place to go to...the people from technicians up to surgeons are fantastic and the facilities are wonderful.
Get all the info you can now...just be a resource hog. Settle on a plan A and a plan B, trust in your higher power, get the best medical team you can and relax as much as you can. I know that is the hardest thing for you to do right now. But it is what everyone told me and THEY WERE RIGHT. The pain is managed so well that it is really low, low on the list of problems. Sneezes were my bit buggaboo. I was released from the Clinic on day 5 with only Tylenol for pain. Never had a bod problem. When you are home, take it very easy but do WALK, WALK, WALK like they tell you to. I am 9 weeks post surgery and virtually doing everything only even better because I can breath and have no pain. I'm on some blood pressure medicine to help my heart realize it doesn't have to work so hard. I hope that will pass too and I can be like my 77 year old Dad and take only a daily vitamin.
I'd say go for the homo like you're thinking, find a place to do it and worry about resurgery in 20 years...who knows what the options will be then...maybe the grow your own will be commonplace by then...maybe they can zap us with their fixer and not even have to operate!
Good luck. If you'd like to chat my Email is ***@****
I also have the infection on the Mital valve.
A friend of mine had surgery done by Dr.Cosgrove, I believe last year and he is doing very well.
I would like to get your thoughts on my condition and if I can make an oppointment with Dr. Cosgrove for his opinion.
Thank you! My e-mail is ***@****
Bob, Jean gave you good advice. I too had a homograft put in 5 weeks ago, I didnt have a waiting period at all. The new stentless porcine valve is the only other valve that I would have picked if I didnt get the Homograft. The mechanicals I hear are noisey. And you have to take blood thinner for the rest of your life. I am 45 and I am back to work already. It is not as bad as you think. Harvey, ***@****.
I've been to many places on the Web for information, and a lot of it is contradictory. However, I think I'm looking at a homograft or other biological, regardless of the reoperation. I don't think I'd thrive on the warfarin, although I can see why many people might choose the mechanical. I guess it's the lack of connection to expert help and advice (cardiologist/clinic) and the unknown of the rate of progression that keep me off-balance.
I'm not thrilled that the Dr. and (apparently) the cardiologist are looking at this as *ho-hum*, no big deal. It IS a big deal. I need to be as prepared as possible to make those decisions that I will need to make. I don't want to wind up taking a certain path just because that's what that particular doctor is used to doing, and just assumes will be best for you. Some doctors seem to feel that if you are under 50, you should automatically go for the mechanical, and just adjust your life to the coumadin. All fixed. Go home.
Interestingly, apart from those who found out at a very early age, or who have age-related heart problems, there seems to be a common thread of people who are very active, perhaps used to carrying heavy weights, etc. This would seem to be a factor in abusing the valve, particularly if it were bicuspid. I wonder what the percentage is of bicuspid vs. tricuspid valves found in initial surgery.
Thanks so much!
Patty
***@****
Sixteen years is a pretty good run for a porcine valve from what I've read, so it wouldn't be unusual for you to need repeat surgery around this time. Especially if you're active. Also note that once they start to leak and fail, the valve failure process seems to go fairly rapidly.
As far as your age, most sources don't seem to feel it to be as much of a risk factor as you might think, assuming there are not other health problems that would be factors. The concensus appears to be that the benefits greatly outweigh the risks. Granted, surgeons may have a different slant on what is an acceptable risk than patients do.
If you're starting to have symptoms and limitations, a new valve is probably the only realistic answer in the long run. The real question is when would be the best time to do it. That is between you and your doctor.
I haven't got much time to make my decision but I'm really unsure.
What are the disadvantages of warfarin? (is this the same as Coumadin?) Do you have to moderate alchohol intake with it? And, in particular, is a mechanical valve noisy? - How noisy, I'm a very light sleeper!! This might sound trivial but it's really troubling me.
Some of your correspondents say; don't worry about re-operation and choose a homograft, and that they might last 20 years. Is this sensible advice, can someone evaluate it?
I had a wonderful Doctor that told me that he wouldnt do the ross procegure on anyone older than a teen ager. He said it just doesnt work as well on older people. I beleived him. I have a Homograft and I dont take any medicine other than a baby asprin a day. If you want to take rat poisan every day for the rest of your life to thin your blood, I guess the mech. is for you. It seems that even the mech. vales dont always last a lifetime like they say they do. Remember that a blood thinner will restrict you if your lifestyle is at all active, and most 36 year olds are. And also remember the noise factor. There is no guarantee no matter what valve you get but you have to decide and then come to piece with yourself about your decision .
I know that things have been rough for you but you WILL make it .
Dont pick the mech. valve just for monetary reasons. Look around on this site and you will see that it doesnt always last a lifetime. Your life is at stake. Money should not be what you are thinking about now. Homograft is also an option, not just a pig valve. Also, as I have said before there is the noise factor with the Mech. Valve. Im sure you will make the right desision, I too am 46. 8 Weeks Post Op.
My partner (30 years) has had double valve replacement (mitral and aortic) and had mechanical valves put in, because he didn't want to have the op again and his surgeon was going to put in a mechanical in the mitral position anyway. He is almost 4 weeks post-op and on Waffarin (same as Coumadin). Being on Waffarin can be taxing since you will need to have PI and INR counts done regularly (i.e. need to take blood samples) so that the dosage of Waffarin can be altered accordingly. He needs to have his PI between 35-40%. Yes, the valves are noisy but you do get used to them. In terms of lifestyle changes his cardiologist hasn't restricted his diet/alcohol intake but I guess alcohol should be taken in moderation. While mechanical valves often seem to be the choice in younger patients it is worthwhile to note that a lot of research is being done on valves, especially to improve the life of bioprothetic valves. Who knows in a few years time you may even be able to grow your own valve. Also not much data on life expectencies on homografts is available, but it does look very promising. All in all it appears that with valve replacement (provided their are no major complications) allows the heart muscle to be much stronger and while there are risks associated with re-operation it is usually quite successful. Whichever valve you decide to go with, make an informed decision not a hasty one.
Good luck and all the very best with surgery.
Regards
Vanessa (***@****)
I know how you feel. My daughter was born with a Truncus
Arteriosis and had her first open heart surgery at 2 months (that
was when they reconstructed her heart). Since then, she has had a total of 5 cariac caths, stents placed, and her 2nd open heart at 6 years old. She is now almost 11 and you would never know all the problems she has had just by looking at her. We know that she still has at least 2 more open hearts and numerus caths to go through; one of them being an aortic valve replacement due
to at this point moderate regurgitation. The main reason I am responing to your comment is that I am well aware of what it is like to raise a child that has chronic cardiac problems. In case you have not already heard about it, there is a place in Great Barrington, Ma.; called The Edward J Madden Memorial, Open Hearts Camp. The only price of admission is having open heart surgery. It is for children 7-13 years old. They go for 2 weeks during the summer and get to meet other kids like them so they know they are not so "different" than other kids. Kids come there from all over the US. If your interested, all I have is there phone # (413)528-2229 and ask for Ken. Good luck.
Wafrin and Coumadin are same family, but not always same, i.e. Coumadin and generic wafrin not accepted as same by some cardiologists. Anyway, been on Coumadin since valve replacement. Yes, it requires monitoring, but again not a huge problem. Blood tests sometimes monthly, sometimes as often as weekly depeding upon what has changed. Have had other surgeries, broken arm, and CABG since valve replacement. Management of blood thinners done well and again not a big deal.
Get a great surgeon and cardiologist, go to major cnter that does lots of valve inplants and plan for a long and good life.
Jim
I would be interested to hear about other experiences of endocarditis and what their causes were.
Cheers, Mike (***@****)
We have a great support group going for valve replacement surgery patients. We have a lot to offer in the way of person to person help for your trying situation.
Go to our website (www.valvereplacement.com) and make an entry in the guestbook and I will help you become a member.
You can learn from us and we can learn from you.
Thanks and hope to see you soon.
Hank Eyring
***@****
A new medical site has been created: http://medleader.cjb.net
"Medleader" is a medical service, which helps the people with a modest prosperity to receive access to inexpensive, accessible and superfine medical care for the low prices (especially to surgical care). It will save your money.
Alex Cravtchuk, General manager of the International Medical and Hospital Service "Medleader"