Hi! My name is Daniel. I'm 34 years old, and just had a valve replacement surgery done at the VA hospital in Miami.(I've been out of the hospital for 3 days now.) My condition was a regurgitating bicuspid
aorticAbdominal aortic aneurysm
Aortic aneurysm
Aortic angiography
Aortic arch syndrome
Aortic dissection
Aortic insufficiency
Aortic rupture, chest x-ray
Aortic stenosis
Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy
Thoracic aortic aneurysm valve, a birth defect that until now was undetected. I just wanted to let everyone in this forum know how much I struggled with the two valve options, and what my decision was. I opted finally (at the last second, practically) for the natural valve. Everything I had researched on
Coumadin was disturbing, and I did a LOT of research in the 7 months before my surgery. As far as I could see, the only benefit to a mechanical valve was no second surgery, but I finally felt that the drawbacks to taking this medication far outweighed the one advantage. How ironic would it be if I got the mechanical valve, only to have my life shortened anyway by getting into a serious accident and bleeding to
deathDiscussing death with children
Gangrene
Liver cell death
Loss of a child - resources
Sudden infant death syndrome, hitting my
headHead and face reconstruction
Head injury
Head lice
Indications of head injury
Radial head injury and hemmorraging, etc... My surgeons said that I could expect a good 12 to 15 years out of my natural valve, and quite possibly never need to have it replaced at all. My surgeons initially made a good case for the mechanical valve, but, after speaking with them, and presenting my research findings to them, concluded that the natural valve indeed had many advantages over the mechanical valve that needed to be taken into consideration. The one thing they did agree on, is that if I did have a second surgery, it would be more complicated, and
recoveryRecovery position - series would be longer, than the
firstFirst progesterone mc10
First progesterone mc5
First-progesterone vgs 100
First-progesterone vgs 200
First-progesterone vgs 25
First-progesterone vgs 400
First-progesterone vgs 50
First-testosterone
First-testosterone mc surgery. I'm willing to take that risk.
Sincerely,
Dan
I think the hardest part of the decision is not knowing how bad the surgery really is.
You have been through it, are still happy with your decision knowing that you may have to go through with it again?
I have read most of the stories on this site; some make it sound not bad at all, others scare the hell out of me.
I am scheduled for surgery Jan. 6th at the University of Michigan. My Surgeon (Steven Bolling)is supposed to be the best in Michigan, so I think I am in good hands.
Once again thanks for the message, and update your progress on this site to let me know how it is going.
I wanted to some how give you piece of mind.
I had my aortic valve replaced w/ a pig valve when I was 38 yrs old. That was a year and a half ago, and I'm having the time of my life. I'm still going to the gym 5-6 days a week. Running two miles hard before my weight trainging. Water skiing 'til my muscles screamed. You'll be fine.
I too struggled w/ the taking of Coumadin, afraid of getting into an accident, bleeding to death was my constant thought. I guess I felt that doing this over agin in 15yrs was worth remaining very active, and not questioning going out on my own wondering the woods. Not to mention haveing beers w/ my buds.
My surgery was done @ Spectrum Health East, Grand Rapids, MI.
The hardest part about the surgery was the backache. Hurt for a couple weeks after. Push yourself to go for those walks afterwords, they realy do help in your recovery.
Don't worry, your scar will fade, mine is not as promanent.
Best Regards,
R.O.B.
If I knew then what I know there would of definetly been a pig valve installed so there could be more normalcy to my life. Maybe some people can take coumidin without problems with clots occuring in there valves but I am taking 11 mg a day and still haveing problems. Those of you whom are taking the time to decide before operation are doing the right thing.
Thanx alot,
Mommof2
I am close to deciding for a tissue valve, as one of my hobbies is cycling ( Many MS150 rides, and a 7 day ride across texas). Even though there are people around, many time you are remote and if you fall/bleed, a hospital may not be close (or anyone for that matter, particularly on training rides).
Keep us posted on your progress. Although I know what Is going to happen, still a nervous time.
Jim in Houston
To answer your question about what to expect during surgery, I have to tell you that it wasn't at all as bad as I had built it up in my mind to be. Surprisingly, the majority of the pain seemed to be concentrated in my back and shoulders. I expected there to be constant, excruciating pain in my chest, but that was not the case. The only time my chest hurt badly was when I coughed, and that pain goes away after about a week. Right now, two weeks after surgery, I have no pain. There are two times after surgery when felt acute pain in the front of my body. One time was right after surgery, when they used my breathing tube to suction out mucus from my lungs before they removed the tube. That makes you cough, and it hurts for a second. The other time was when they removed my chest tube. That wasn't so much pain as it was uncomfortable pressure located in my upper stomach. They gave me morphine before that, so it wasn't that bad. I hope I answered some of your questions, and helped you become clearer as to which valve you'll choose. Get back to me!
Sincerely,
Dan
I was actually diagnosed with MVP as a child and thought this is what I had all these years. My surgeon told me this was a common mistake in the past.
As far as symptoms I have none! I saw a cardiologist when I was 18 and he wanted to see me every two years for a checkup. I didn't see him again until 1995 when I needed clearance for back surgery ( Which I ended up not doing because I wanted to wait until after hunting season, and my pain nearly disappeared by the end of it). He still said I should see him every two years to keep an eye on my condition.
Because I had no symptoms it was easy to ignore this however, and I didn't see him at all since then. In August of this year I went to my doctor for another problem and thought I might as well schedule an appointment to see the cardiologist again. Unfortunately he retired and I had to see a new guy who said it was time to fix this problem. I was shocked to say the least and thought the guy was nuts! He referred me to a surgeon and he agreed however. He told me that my heart was enlarged to 53 centimeters (35 - 45 is normal) and that sooner or later it would give out. (He said maybe 5 - 15 years) He said he would rather work on a healthy heart than a failing one, and so here I am.
It is very tempting to put this off, but all of this happened right after John Ritter's unfortunate death and my wife is scared to death I am going to keel over any minute!
Hope this helps!
Steve
I am glad to hear you are doing well.
I have pretty much made the decision to go with a biological valve. (I go for pre-op testing on December 29th and have to tell them then)
I think what makes the decision so hard is that for every person that hates coumadin there is someone who says it is no big deal.
My surgeon actually recommended the biological. He says that surveys have been done that proved that people with biological valves are happier in the long run even with repeat surgeries. The people at St. Jude's onevalveforlife.com would disagree.
Of course, they are selling mechanical valves.
I figure as young as I am, I should be able to handle another surgery with no problem, and can get the mechanical then, if I feel I made the wrong decision.
I will try to keep you up-to-date after the surgery. I am trying to catch up at work, enjoy the holidays with my family and not think about the surgery.
As it draws closer everyone is getting nervous. My 10 year old daughter is giving me more hugs and kisses than ever lately, and drawing pictures of her and I together. My 14 year old is good at hiding her feelings, and doesn't seem too nervous. Of course she is extremely smart, (actually wants to be a doctor) so maybe she knows every thing will be fine!
I want thank everyone who has participated in this conversation, it really is a lot of help. I will try to check in as much as possible to let you know how things are going after the surgery and plan to register with the valvereplacement.com site also.
Good luck to all, and keep me up-to-date on your progress Dan and Jim.
It is too late now for malpractice as this was 3 yrs ago. anywise I would admit to missing a dose once every week or so and I was working too hard. Believe would be difficult to win.
You had better know that my wife and I follow the Inrs ourselves and keep the correct levels. The stroke is hard to get over and do not want another.
7 days from today, I will just be entering the surgery room. The Holiday's have been great with family and friends (and low stress!). This morning I am doing final wrap-up at work for the 5-6 weeks I will be out. I plan to talk to the Surgeon on Jan. 2. After much readying, surfing, discussion and prayer, I have decided on a tissue valve. This discussion has been most helpful.
I feel I am in great hands here in Houston. While the next 7 days will be long (i.e. waiting), I look forward to getting the first 2 months of 2004 behind me and returning to a more "normal" life.
Regards
I have congenital VSD and was diagnosed with moderate AI at age 18 (I'm 43 now). The VSD is causing one of the aortic valve flaps to prolapse causing regurgatation. I have led a normal life until I was diagnosed with endocarditis about 3 months ago (after a long bout of bronchitis). After 7 weeks of IV Rocephin 2GM daily the endocarditis has cleared up. I just had a follow up with a cardiologist and he has recommended repairing the VSD and replacing my aortic valve in the very near future due to the risk of recurrent endocarditis. So I am going through the same decision process with which valve to choose. When I had the consult with the CV surgeon he recommended the St. Jude mechanical valve. I explained my reluctance with Coumadin (I'm in the pharmacy field) and he said that there are some new anticoagulants without the drawbacks of Coumadin that are now in clinical trials. I did some research and found that there is a new drug called Exanta manufactured by AstraZeneca which has already been approved in France, has been applied for approval in the rest of Europe, and is expected to be applied for approval in the US in the next year. This drug does not require monitoring for levels or diet restrictions and appears to be more effective than Coumadin. Due to my age, if I know this drug will be available soon as a safer alternative to Coumadin I will choose the mechanical valve. If not, I'm leaning towards a stentless biological valve. My question is has anyone heard of this drug, and will it be approved for use for anticoagulant use for aortic valve replacement (it looked like the trials were all on patients to prevent venous thrombosis in orthopedic knee and hip replacement surgeries). Also, does anyone have any comments on the homograph or Ross procedure as alternatives to bio or mechanical valve replacement.
Thanks
Regarding my valve, as I was waking up from the operation, I was trying to figure out what that "ticking" sound in my left ear was. The surgeon came by about an hour later to let me know that they had to switch their plan mid-operation (original plan was tissue). Ultimately the size of my valve opening was 2.9cm, so they had to go to a St. Jude Mechanical (I understand the largest St. Jude they make is a 3.1cm). In addition, the calicum buildup/deposits were much worse than thought...in fact, they had to pick calcium bits out of my heart. Although I wanted a tissue, for all the reasons that have been debated here and elsewhere, I am OK with what they had to do. I totally trust the surgeon and his team that they made the correct decision.
Overall, surgery was 4.5 hours, and a real pain in the back for the first 2 days until I got up walking. I had no idea how much my back and lower back would hurt just laying around in ICU.
But, as I said in the beginning of my message, I feel great and am so glad to be on the recovery side of the operation. I will remember January 7, 2004 for the rest of my life.
Regards
JIM
What was that made your doctors decide to go with the Mechanical valve? You mention something about the size of your valve opening. I don't know too much about the differences between the the biological and Mech valves besides what it has been posted in this forum, but it sounds like they are made of different sizes?
Thanks in advance, and hope you keep progessing steadily in your recuperation process!
Best wishes,
Michael
Anybody with similar symptoms or with any info would be more than welcome to comment.
From this Sunday's local paper's magazine section:
<< ximelagatran (to be marketed as Exanta): Derived from amino acids, it inhibits the action of thrombin, a constituent of the blood that affects clotting. A considerable amount of research has shown that Exanta is at least as effective, possibly more so, as warfarin (Coumadin).
And this drug, unlike warfarin, uses a fixed dose without having to monitor coagulation. When Exanta becomes available (it's expected in the near future), you won't need to check your blood while taking it: It is not affected by food or other medication; and although it leaves you vulnerable to bleeding (after all, it is an anticoagulant), it is safe. Its introduction will emancipate most, if not all, users of warfarin. >>
Hope this helps.
Best luck to all.
Michael
Melt: You should search the web for info on the Ross Procedure, here is a link from my doctor’s hospital, Beth Israel in NYC http://www.wehealny.org/advances/ross.html My operation was actually at St. Lukes, because Dr. Stelzer was head of Cardiac Surgery there at the time. Both Hospitals will treat you and your family with great care. If your from out of town, they even provide your family an apartment at no cost, while your in the hospital. Dr. Stelzer even took my wife and kids, along with some of his staff, out to lunch. He is just a wonderful person and a great doctor. I’m ever so grateful to him, that tears of happiness come to my eyes thinking of him, and how he has allowed me to continue a completely normal life, like I never had a problem.
I didn't have a choice when my aortic valve was replaced by the bental procedure in '98.
Coumadin has definatley become a life style rather just another maintance med. Given the chance and knowing what I know now,
I would have went with the tisue valve.
But the unforseen complications from my arotic disection caused some excess tisue that causes clotting and I would have ended up on coumidan any way. When my surgeon was approached by my cardio doc for his opinion of second surgery to correct this condition. His reply was"I wouldn't touch him again with a 10 foot pole."
..My point is: what if within the 10 to 15 years for some unforseen reason you are no longer a canidate for surgery and that valve needs to be replaced......?
P.S. we have all been givin a 2nd chance at life, go forth and enjoy it and help someone else less fortunate than ourselves along the way....jay
I had an AVR operation in Aug of 2001 when I was 49. It was the very first operation in my life.
My wife and I debated on a tissue valve or the newest St. Jude valve. We decided on the St Jude valve as we didn't want to even think of having this surgery again even though it meant taking coumadin.
I have to say that I have had no problems at all in taking the coumadin and the new St Jude valve is extremely quite. My wife normally has to put her head on my chest to hear it. I have remained in excellent health and swim 12 miles a month.
I would recommend the St Jude valve to anyone. One heart surgery in a lifetime is more then enough!!!
Chip1