Member Comments are provided by individuals and reflect their personal opinions only. Under NO circumstances should you act on any advice or opinion posted in this forum. ALWAYS check with your personal physician before taking any action regarding your health! MedHelp International and our partners, sponsors and affiliates have no obligation to monitor any comments posted on this site, or the content and/or accuracy of such exchanges. MedHelp International does not endorse the views of any user.
Wont be able to see the Doctor for another two weeks but was able to get a copy of my results below. I don't understand what the results are saying and very anxious to know what it means.
FINAL IMPRESSION: SINUS RHYTHM, SYMPTOMS DO NOT SEEM TO CORRELATE WITH ANY ELECTROCARDIOGRAPHIC FINDINGS. THERE APPEARS TO BE EARLY REPOLARIZATION ON THE TRACINGS
I'm no expert but it appears normal to me. Of course, your doctor will give the final pronouncement on that.
But it seems your heart rate is within normal limits. The ekg did pick up two premature ventricular contractions (PVCs) and four premature atrial contractions (PACs) but that's normal too (and harmless). Your cardiologist should explain the significance of the early repolarization but it's my understanding that also is harmless.
For the first one, they are saying that when you noted that you were having palpitations (you usually keep a diary when you wear a holter), you actually were NOT because your monitor showed you were in sinus rythym.
The longest pause at 1.2 seconds just means that was the longest interval between beats so if you think about it your heart was beating at 50 beats per minutes at it's very slowest. This was probably while you were sleeping. Pauses under 2.5 seconds are not significant (generally). Your report is very 'normal' sounding
Hi, I see no one has answered your second question yet. My EKG has shown "early repolarisation" in the past, I'm not sure if it still does as I don't know how to read an EKG. The bottom line is that it is usually considered benign BUT, depending on other findings, MIGHT be associated with an increased risk of ventricular arrhythmia. I do know that, as a student pilot, the FAA put me through a real gauntlet of tests to prove that I didn't have structural heart disease when I first applied for a medical certificate, and a cardiologist "in the know" told me that the early repolarisation finding was probably what worried them the most (more so than MVP, which I also "might" have).
A recent editorial in the New England Journal of Medicine:
So the doctors don't seem to agree yet on what this means, but something to take comfort in is that it is seen in 2% to 5% of the population. To me that says that for many or most of us, it is probably a normal variant.
i'm nervous. i'm 33 very fit and mom of 3... i have been having a weird feeling in my chest now for over a month...i finally went in and they did an EKG and said it was "pretty normal" not knowing what that meant, i said, okay where do we go from here..she thought i may have a potassium imbalance so she ordered full blood work and a holter mon. Well now they are referring me to a cardiologist bc they they said they think my heard is constricting prematurely.... however the Dr's assistant called me not even the Dr. and her tone seemed like it was "no big deal" meanwhile I am freaking and am afraid to go to sleep! HELP!!!!????
But it seems your heart rate is within normal limits. The ekg did pick up two premature ventricular contractions (PVCs) and four premature atrial contractions (PACs) but that's normal too (and harmless). Your cardiologist should explain the significance of the early repolarization but it's my understanding that also is harmless.
1. SINUS RHYTHM, SYMPTOMS DO NOT SEEM TO CORRELATE WITH ANY ELECTROCARDIOGRAPHIC FINDINGS
2. THERE APPEARS TO BE EARLY REPOLARIZATION ON THE TRACINGS
Can anyone give me insite on question nunber two?
"The longest pause is 1.2 seconds".
A recent editorial in the New England Journal of Medicine:
http://content.nejm.org/cgi/content/full/358/19/2063
So the doctors don't seem to agree yet on what this means, but something to take comfort in is that it is seen in 2% to 5% of the population. To me that says that for many or most of us, it is probably a normal variant.