Heart Disease Community
Normal Echo reference values
About This Community:

A community of people with Heart Disease to guide and support your heart-health journey. Ask a question, join a conversation, share experiences: symptoms, nutrition, and management.

Font Size:
A
A
A
Background:
Blank
Blank
Blank
Blank Blank

Normal Echo reference values

Hi.

I'm a bit confused about reference values for cardiac dimensions on echo. According to The American Society of Echocardiography, the normal dimensions for the left ventricle at diastole is < 60 mm. Others say that 55 mm is the normal upper limit. Yet others say absolute values are useless and that you should index for body surface are or height.

Personally, I have a left ventricular diameter of 57 mm, and would like to know if that is considered normal? BSa of 2,0 mm, 193 cm.
Related Discussions
7 Comments Post a Comment
Blank
66068_tn?1365196781
Obviously one size does not fit all and ventricular diameter should be indexed to body surface area and/or height. I personally don't like BSA because it discriminates against tall people (like you I am tall, 191 cm). Refer to Table 3 in the JACC paper "Association of fat-free mass and training status with left ventricular size and mass in endurance-trained athletes" by Gillian A. Whalley et al, J Am Coll Cardiol, 2004; 44:892-896, doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2004.04.051 (it's found at http://content.onlinejacc.org/cgi/content/full/44/4/892#TBL1 ). They give the following values for "untrained" normal individuals (the value for trained atheletes are larger):
LVEDD/BSA (mm/m2) = 26.9 plus or minus 0.38
LVEDD/height (mm/m) = 29.7 plus or minus 0.47

A 2.0 m2 BSA translates to a value of 53.8 mm plus or minus 0.76 mm. So, on a BSA basis, your 57 mm is a little above normal unless you're an athlete (which showed mid-range vales of 57 mm). A height of 1.93 m tranlates to roughly 59 mm plus or minus 1 mm.  So your 57 mm stacks up in the normal range there (and small for an athlete).

It seems to me that your left ventricular diameter is normal.
Blank
Avatar_n_tn
Thanks for the post!

I'm not an athlete, but when performing an exercise test on a bicycle, I landed on 125 % of normal, which would place me above the 2 SDs considered "normal", so I guess I am quite fit. I guess that as long as I don't have any significant symptoms (except for my PVCs, which come and go...) there's no reason to be concerned.
Blank
Avatar_n_tn
Interesting that this post was just created.  My Cardiologist basically told me my heart was minimally enlarged, at 5.6 cm (translates to 56 mm), but he's not concerned simply because my heart muscle is strong and all the valves and such are in perfect working order.  After researching, I have found a lot of people have different takes as to what qualifies as a minimally enlarged heart, and it seems Cardiologists can view them differently.

Thanks for the post, va_tony.
Blank
61536_tn?1340701763
Whoever said that you need your body surface area is correct.

A simple formula if you know your end diastolic dimension is EDD/BSA to determine if your heart size is normal for you.  In your case, this would then be 5.7 divided by 2.0 = 2.85 cms (normal is less than 2.7 cms per meter squared body surface area).  Based on this it would appear that your LV is ever so slightly enlarged, but probably within normal limits given your level of acivity - which this calculation does not factor in.

Hope this helps :)

Blank
Avatar_n_tn
Where do you find the 2,7 cm meassurement? According to The American Society of Echocardiography, normal is less than 3,1 cm per m2, which is much larger.
Blank
61536_tn?1340701763
From a cardiologist.
Blank
Avatar_n_tn
Okay, I guess that's one of the many things that vary among different labs and cardiologist. I suppose the best thing is to relate to the values your own cardiologist uses.
Blank
Post a Comment
To
Top Heart Disease Answerers
976897_tn?1379171202
Blank
ed34
watford, United Kingdom
159619_tn?1318997813
Blank
erijon
Salt Lake City, UT
63984_tn?1385441539
Blank
Flycaster305
97303, OR
Avatar_f_tn
Blank
skydnsr
11548417_tn?1423126466
Blank
Ger57
Netherlands
Avatar_m_tn
Blank
Occupant
IL
Blank
BloodPressure Tracker
Monitor Your Blood Pressure
Start Tracking Now
Blank
HeartRhythm Tracker
Track your Heart Condition
Start Tracking Now
Recent Activity
Avatar_m_tn
Blank
Lucky_M commented on When Your Cold Is Not...
May 04
566249_tn?1294661218
Blank
GardeniaDreams very tired. Comment
May 03
13573062_tn?1430556631
Blank
Dr_JCLU uploaded new photos
May 02
Heart Disease Community Resources
RSS Expert Activity
748543_tn?1371753642
Blank
TMJ/TMJ The Connection Between Teet...
Jan 27 by Hamidreza Nassery , DMD, FICOI, FAGDBlank
469720_tn?1388149949
Blank
Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm-treatable... Blank
Oct 04 by Lee Kirksey, MDBlank
242532_tn?1269553979
Blank
The 3 Essentials to Ending Emotiona...
Sep 18 by Roger Gould, M.D.Blank
Top Heart Disease Answerers
976897_tn?1379171202
Blank
ed34
watford, United Kingdom
159619_tn?1318997813
Blank
erijon
Salt Lake City, UT
63984_tn?1385441539
Blank
Flycaster305
97303, OR
Avatar_f_tn
Blank
skydnsr
11548417_tn?1423126466
Blank
Ger57
Netherlands
Avatar_m_tn
Blank
Occupant
IL