Posted By Mimi on June 30, 1998 at 19:07:58:
In Reply to: Re: Bleeding in Relation to
AorticAbdominal aortic aneurysm
Aortic aneurysm
Aortic angiography
Aortic arch syndrome
Aortic dissection
Aortic insufficiency
Aortic rupture, chest x-ray
Aortic stenosis
Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy
Thoracic aortic aneurysm Valve
StenosisAortic stenosis
Blocked tear duct
Carotid stenosis, x-ray of the left artery
Carotid stenosis, x-ray of the right artery
Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy
Mitral stenosis
Pulmonary valve stenosis
Pyloric stenosis
Renal artery stenosis
Spinal stenosis posted by CCF CARDIO MD - MTR on June 29, 1998 at 14:54:13:
Please excluse my previous "follow up" post, I didn't realize how to post it and accidentally re-posted the entire original message and reply.
Thank you for your reply to my original question, it was very helpful. My father did stop the
Coumadin prior to the
colonoscopy and underwent the procedure on Monday. They only found a couple of small harmless polyps which they removed and cauterized. They do not believe they were the source of the occult blood in the stool. Now they have him scheduled for an upper GI procedure for next Tuesday to ascertain whether he has a
pepticCause of peptic ulcers
Location of peptic ulcers
Peptic relief
Peptic ulcer ulcer or other lesion that could be causing bleeding. He has no symptoms but I understand that isn't unusual.
I do have one question regarding the
malformationsImperforate anus
Imperforate anus repair
Pulmonary arteriovenous fistula of the blood vessels that you mentioned in your reply. Would those show up in a colonoscopy? If not, how would they be diagnosed?
If it turns out (as I suspect) that there is no cause of bleeding in the stomach, what is the next step? Is it always definite that there is a problem when there is occult blood in the stool? Is it possible it could have just been a temporary irritation?
Thanks for your help.