Nutrition Health Chat: Tuesday, Dec. 8th, 5-6 PM Eastern. Learn how vitamins, minerals, and phytonutrients affect your health. Free live Q&A. Join us!
Member Comments are provided by individuals and reflect their personal opinions only. Under NO circumstances should you act on any advice or opinion posted in this forum.  ALWAYS check with your personal physician before taking any action regarding your health! MedHelp International and our partners, sponsors and affiliates have no obligation to monitor any comments posted on this site, or the content and/or accuracy of such exchanges. MedHelp International does not endorse the views of any user.
Heart Disease  (Expert Forum)
 | 
Repair of the Tricuspid Valve
This forum is for questions and support regarding heart issues such as: Angina, Angioplasty, Arrhythmia, Bypass Surgery, Cardiomyopathy, Coronary Artery Disease, Defibrillator, Heart Attack, Heart Disease, High Blood Pressure, Mitral Valve Prolapse, Pacemaker, PAD, Stenosis, Stress Tests.

Repair of the Tricuspid Valve

by DottyCece, Jan 23, 2004 12:00AM
As I become more informed, I am amazed at the wide divergent opinions among experts regarding the need to repair the tricuspid valve.  Could you tell me why there is so much varying opinion?  I realize there is current research being done by Dr. Patrick McCarthy, Dr. Young at CC and by others in England and at the Mayo Clinic.  However, their views differ from what I see done in my community which appears to be based on the old beliefs and old science. It would seem to me that if a person  who presented with atrial fib, biatrial enlargement, moderate to severe regur in both the MV and TV would benefit from a repair at the time of the repair/replacement of the MV.  In this case the TV was not addressed at the time of surgery because the surgeon believed that the TV would improve with adequate repair of the MV.  However, even at that time, the cardiologist's view was that the TV needed to be repaired to prevent chronic problems with peripheral edema etc.  Currently, there is signifiant peripheral edema, JVD, fatigue, poor activity tolerance etc.  A second opinion was sought from another cardiologist who said that the TV should be repaired asap.  Upon consult with another heart surgeon, his opinion was "no" and cited the old beliefs held about the TV. So, currently we are in a holding pattern.  It is difficult to use diuretics secondary to no parathyroids..so electrolytes are an issue.  A TEE is scheduled for Feb. and a right heart rest and exercise transthoracic echo for next month sometime.  I am considering sending all of this to Dr. McCarthy.  Wbat else could I pursue?

by CCF-M.D.-RCJ, Jan 23, 2004 12:00AM
DottyCece,

Thanks for the post.

Q1:"Could you tell me why there is so much varying opinion?"

Whenever good date cannot guide us, then we rely on opinion.  And as you know, opinions are like elbows, everyone's got them.  So opinions will continue to vary until solid data about TV repair/replacement becomes available.

Q2:"Wbat else could I pursue?"

You said it yourself: "However, their views differ from what I see done in my community which appears to be based on the old beliefs and old science. "

Seek an opinion at a state-of-the-art center.  The decision to pursue re-do surgery is always a judgement call, and is even more so when you are talking about the tricuspid valve.

Good luck.
Continue discussion
RSS Expert Activity
What You Can Learn From Tiger Woods...
Dec 04 by Steven Y Park, MD
When the Mexican Drug Trade Hits th...
Dec 03 by Arnold L Goldman, D.V.M.
In the ER: Coffee, anyone?
Dec 02 by Jon Geller, D.V.M.