Heart Disease Community
Stress Test vs. Angiography
About This Community:

Join others with Heart Disease and get guidance and support. Ask a question, join a conversation, share experiences.

Font Size:
A
A
A
Background:
Blank
Blank
Blank
Blank Blank

Stress Test vs. Angiography

To what extent would an angiogram be capable of picking up coronary atherosclerosis that would tend to go unnoticed by a nuclear stress test?  Would an angiogram offer greater risks than a stress test? How great would that additional risk tend to be?


This discussion is related to Stress test accuracy.
Related Discussions
2 Comments Post a Comment
Blank
159619 tn?1318997813
A nuclear stress test is about 85% accurate in finding CAD whereas a angiogram is 100% accurate. The angiogram also carries a 1 - 3% risk of complications, the most common risk, although very rare, is having an artery dissected during the procedure which results in emergency bypass surgery. Having said that, if I was told I needed one I would do it without hesitation. It is the gold standard of heart tests to determine if CAD is present. I have had 2 nuclear stress tests in the past three years that were normal so I never needed a cath, but would galdly do it if my cardiologist said it was necessary.

Good Luck,

Jon
Blank
Avatar n tn
Another alternative that should be discussed is a 64 slice CT scan.  I had three nuclear scans in three years prior to my successful ablation for a fib.  All indicated good blood flow to the heart.  I wanted a CT scan to rule out any artery disease as a contributor to my a fib, but my cardiologists told me it was not medically necessary.  I finally convinced them that it was for my peace of mind even if they thought it was unnecessary, and I would pay for it.  The scan, a very simple and quick procedure, suggested I was 40-70% blocked in two arteries.  It was useful information and I am now adjusting my diet, exercise, and cholesterol meds to respond to that new found information.  
   As earlier stated, the angiogram is the gold standard--but with risks.  The CT is very good, noninvasive, and has only the very slight risk associated with radiation.  
Blank
Post a Comment
To
Top Heart Disease Answerers
159619 tn?1318997813
Blank
Salt Lake City, UT
11548417 tn?1440481484
Blank
Netherlands
Avatar universal
Blank
Avatar universal
Blank
Avatar universal
Blank
Ireland
Blank
BloodPressure Tracker
Monitor Your Blood Pressure
Start Tracking Now
Blank
HeartRhythm Tracker
Track your Heart Condition
Start Tracking Now
Recent Activity
Avatar universal
Blank
Paxiled commented on Gun Disarm Technique...
4 hrs ago
566249 tn?1294661218
Blank
GardeniaDreams So very tired. Comment
15 hrs ago
1236893 tn?1408490528
Blank
gymdandee commented on Gun Disarm Technique...
23 hrs ago
Heart Disease Community Resources
RSS Expert Activity
233488 tn?1310696703
Blank
Marathon Running Done Over Many Yea...
05/15 by John C Hagan III, MD, FACS, FAAOBlank
233488 tn?1310696703
Blank
New Article on Multifocal IOL vs &q...
05/15 by John C Hagan III, MD, FACS, FAAOBlank
748543 tn?1463449675
Blank
TMJ/TMJ The Connection Between Teet...
01/15 by Hamidreza Nassery , DMD, FICOI, FAGD, FICCMOBlank
Top Heart Disease Answerers
159619 tn?1318997813
Blank
Salt Lake City, UT
11548417 tn?1440481484
Blank
Netherlands
Avatar universal
Blank
Avatar universal
Blank
Avatar universal
Blank
Ireland