A followup to my situation. I had
mitralMitral regurgitation - chronic
Mitral stenosis
Mitral valve prolapse valve replacement 5/21/03 and
pacemaker insertion. I had a
normalNormal saline flush EF, coronary arteries etc. After surgery, I had heart failure, atr fib/flutter requiring 7
cardioversions. Followup echos showed a tissue mass at the
posteriorAnterior vaginal wall repair
Posterior fossa tumor
Posterior heart arteries
Posterior spinal anatomy
Skeleton (posterior view)
Spinal fusion
Uveitis
Vertebrobasilar circulatory disorders ventricularParoxysmal supraventricular tachycardia (psvt)
Ultrasound, ventricular septal defect - heartbeat
Ventricular assist device
Ventricular fibrillation
Ventricular septal defect
Ventricular tachycardia border but echos show MV functioning well at rest. I complained but never got anywhere except adding drugs etc. So, I sought a second opinion from a cardiologist with an expertise in pulm HTN. On stress echo, I had high PA pressures and a drop in pulse ox. A cardiac catheterization showed high PA pressures, high wedge (41 with arm exercise) and a very high v wave. She recommmended a redo of the mitral valve, ring on the TV and biatrial ablations. This was done 4/27/04. I already feel much better. Pacemaker is a backup and I am on my own intrinsic rhythm.When the surgeon (a different one who is a valve expert) opened the heart, he noted a soft tissue mass in 1/3 to 1/2 of the mitral valve opening and when the valve was removed, he noted a very poor suturing job under that valve. So all along it was the MV and no one really went there for the cause of all my problems. It took fresh eyes etc.
1. Why was this soft tissue problem not picked up on echo, either TEE or TTE?
2. I was discharged on aspirin with the coumadin and Levonox. Is aspirin commonly used with coumadin? What are the pros and cons of this approach? Prior to this surgery I only took coumadin.
3. How long does it take for the ablations to heal? I have a lot of bigeminal PVCs with any activity right now, less with rest.
It is my understanding that surgeons try to repair valves if they are able to do so. About 80% of valves are repaired. In my case, it was 50/50 so they elected to replace. There are some surgeons who replace more readily because they are finding that with a repair, there is often a need to go back in and replace. Age is a factor. Regarding the pump: the less pump time the less complications. I am not sure how replace vs. repair stacks up in terms of time on pump. I have been on the pump for both surgeries and have had not complications. This time I notice some short term memory issues but that could be from drugs.